should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'?: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=80744

[Poll]

should Hemeola man be given back ' Fellow privilages' ?
yes
  45% (11)
no
  20% (5)
dont care
  33% (8)


Total Votes : 24
(last vote on : Dec. 12 2007 1:11:56) 


Message

Guest -> should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 15:51:55)

vote!

(incidently, how does the fellow stuff work.when are you eligible?)

good luck hemeola man, i hope you get it[:o]



Ailsa -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 16:03:33)

Who voted don't care? [:@][:@][:@] This is my adopted nephew we talking about!

Tia Ailsa



Jenny -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 16:07:18)

Well I'm sure Hemeola man should get his 'fellow' privileges but am really not sure what they are???



Ailsa -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 16:26:21)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jenny

Well I'm sure Hemeola man should get his 'fellow' privileges but am really not sure what they are???



We don't know either. All we know is that one day he was a fellow with 5 yellow star-blob thingies under his name, and the next he was back to being an aficionado with just the one.

Actually we don't know how you become a fellow in the first place either.... [&:]



koella -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 16:47:35)

I think it's the number of posts you make.
Funny thing: On melcamp, they take away points from you when you make unusefull posts, and you're degraded as a little schoolboy.



Arash -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 17:37:46)

If he wants, he can have my stars and my fellow status.
I dont care.......oh, and i was the one who voted for "i dont care" Ailsa [:)]
Haha!



Bogdan1980 -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 17:48:20)

Delcamp forum in general is very similar to Orwell's 1984 novel setting. They treat you much like a child quite a few times. There are some cocky punks there. As far as hemeola, let's give him the privileges!!!



falsetanuova -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 20:36:57)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ailsa

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jenny

Well I'm sure Hemeola man should get his 'fellow' privileges but am really not sure what they are???



We don't know either. All we know is that one day he was a fellow with 5 yellow star-blob thingies under his name, and the next he was back to being an aficionado with just the one.

Actually we don't know how you become a fellow in the first place either.... [&:]



Hilarious <Laugh>
I love this place...much more refreshing than "Delcamp" snobs..sigh..

Yes, give them to him, then we can just threaten him all the time that we're gonna take them from him again if he doesnt do well!

Oh, the pressure...these stars...as Picasso says, "to live like a poor man with means" is the way!

ciao



Adam -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 21:24:20)

haha yeah, I've been wondering, who DOES get fellow status, and what are the privileges? Besides bragging rights [;)]



Ron.M -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 21:33:22)

quote:

haha yeah, I've been wondering, who DOES get fellow status, and what are the privileges? Besides bragging rights


Fellowships are not arbitrary.

You become a "fellow" after posting more than 500 posts.

I have no idea how Hemeolaman suddenly became a fellow, unless it was some sort of glitch.
Don't blame me.

Hope that clears things up.

cheers,

Ron



Ron.M -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 21:36:16)

quote:

and what are the privileges?


The rights to deflower any virgin joining the Forum.
(Female or Male according to your taste..[:D])

cheers,

Ron



Arash -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 21:45:43)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron.M

quote:

and what are the privileges?


The rights to deflower any virgin joining the Forum.
(Female or Male according to your taste..[:D])

cheers,

Ron


haha......thats good! Can we also deflower the oldies?
I would like to deflower Florian. (after i saw his hair and jacket)[:)]



Doitsujin -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 21:51:07)

Who is Hemalton? Hemron?? Whatever... give him his rights.. But forget the deflowerthing.



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 6 2007 23:36:23)

hahaha
you guys are great!

i'm laughing my ass off reading this lol

[:)][:)][:)][:)]

guess i have to post a few hundred more times eh? that should take... about 2 weeks lol



Escribano -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 0:13:26)

500 posts gets "fellow" and I didn't take any away. No exceptions. If you had more, my apologies on behalf of an ASP programmer who couldn't do c++ [8D]



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 0:46:27)

i know, the whole thing is just hugely funny, its not like im bitter or anything lol

i jus thtink its funny that i was a fellow with like 210 posts lol



Estevan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 1:16:10)

quote:


i jus thtink its funny that i was a fellow with like 210 posts lol

Yeah, it's good. The thing is, I'm sure that the 'number of posts' listed is pretty inaccurate, as there's no way that I've posted as many as it says.

Anyway, Hem, this status thing could be a mixed blessing; as a Fellow, you are admitted here:



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



Estevan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 1:17:39)

...................whereas, as a lowly aficionado, you just get to hang out here:



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 2:00:56)

lol yeah, that's true, but, i can also .......... . . . . .. ..... . .. .. .. . . play ottmar liebert tunes and have the same effect on mindless young girls!! haha lol



eccullen -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 3:03:03)

I haven't posted anything recently, .... but have been lurking.
With so much dissension in recent threads I thought I should chime in again.
With the administrative rule (re quantity) combined with the formal vote (re quality) implying an alternate pathway I'm not sure what a quiet semi-lurker should think.
And if I vote does it count fully, partially, negatively ?
How about if one is quietly lurking on the proposition about lurker thread does that make it meta-lurking and improve or worsen the status of a lurker ?

I think that the question about hemeolaman could solved by the earlier decision about adoption. Just determine that fellowship is a component of every adoption; this could be the alternate pathway.....



gato -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 3:43:37)

What, am I supposed to log in and say something about this? Oh please excuse me, I just did! [:D]

Actually, I would think that Hemeolaman could generate enough happiness at whatever status he could have on the foro, I mean, he is a easy going kind of guy. He likes to make poo and fart jokes.....'All this aside oh I would say at what ever level he is a happy man. He is a funny man! Ha ha ha ha ha.....[:D]

[:@]



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 3:51:57)

you are wise in the ways of the foro, eccullen lol

gato, you are one hip CAT! get it ???!??!?! cat = gato = cat= hip cat lollollollol

k so i took that about a mile and a half too far lol



gato -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 4:25:54)

Actually Heme, you are an adult, a very intellegent person, at the age of 19? And this is an adult web site, so it would seem. You get it! I have every confidence in you, in that you could see what is going on. I don't mean to be rude, I just want to say, show us that intellegence. Show us what you can do. Show us that spark! I know that you can........

Gary



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 4:51:07)

you sooo left yourself open for this one [:D][;)]



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



gato -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 5:00:52)

Good, now make some really intellegent adult posts and threads.....we need your contribution, after all is said and done......



HemeolaMan -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 6:42:15)

be my surrogate foro dad!!!!! lol

alright, i'll straighten up and act intelligent occasionally, however, not too often

i've noticed most intellectual threads are shot clean out of the sky and mocked (koella usualyl mocks pretty well, i'm jealous) thus, i am not keen on making one

but, if you would care to post something threadly i would be delighted to add my two intelligent, independent, sophisticated and otherwise incidentally inclined cents.



Guest -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 7:07:58)

lets discuss string theory[&:]



gato -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 8:05:00)

You've nothiced that too? Intellectual threads are difficult to come by and this is a public forum on the Internet. You never know who is sitting at the computer, and I guess that's what makes it all the more interesting. I mean, after all, you've got to admit there's nothing quite like it. But then again, we're not a lot of hazy snobs like on some other forums out there. I agree, and I have a hard time giving into the preocupation with making threads too....



Adam -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 8:19:12)

Well, maybe we should be a bit more intellectual; you never know what the lurkers want to hear, since they don't speak up and tell us! So I'm just gonna throw this out there: supermassive black holes at the center of active galactic nuclei. While I think it is now clear that AGNs evidencing broad hydrogen lines and those lacking such spectral features differ only in the angle at which they're situated relative to our line of sight, due to interstellar dust thick enough to absorb the vast intensity of light put out by the central black hole's accretion disk, but it still seems unclear precisely what the structure of such AGNs within a parsec is, particularly whether or not the dust is in the shape of a torus or otherwise.

Discuss [sm=tongue.gif]



Guest -> RE: should Hemeola man be given back 'Fellow privilages'? (Dec. 7 2007 8:21:28)

what was that boindexter?[:D] (jk) how about joing the chess tournament instead?



Page: [1] 2    >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET