RE: Volume and lowering the action (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - Lutherie: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=22
- - - RE: Volume and lowering the action: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=78293



Message

Anders Eliasson -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 17:37:11)

quote:

I am sorry that I have responded so vigorously today but I really have had more than enough of this sh@t from people here and am really dissapointed to find it coming from YOU. Your post was out of character and more worryingly your target was predictable . People often don't get me and that is my fault, I am a poor diplomat and use a style of prose which many peopl object to,


OK OK OK. I´m sorry and please accept my opologies.[:-] I think you are right. That I didnt get you, and rereading my post (after reading yours) makes me see that it was to much headed on you. That wasnt my intentions. It was way to personal and not very tastefull and even less respectfull. Sorry
And please let me say that I´ve NEVER had anything against you or anything you have written. OK

The whole volume question is very complicated and maybe I´m wrong, but I still feel that in this thread we (not just you and me) are talking about very different things.



guitarbuddha -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 17:44:33)

Thank you Anders. I am grateful for and glad to be able to accept your apology.

I hope to continue to learn from your posts. I have admired your dedication to your art and your generosity and enthusiasm in sharing the results with us.

David.



Anders Eliasson -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 17:53:21)

With respect of having only one guitar, a hybrid (I remember that thread).... Well of course its possible but it will be a compromise. Imagine a guitar where you have taken away the most radical characteristics of a flamenco and a classical guitar.
Flamenco, very dry non harmonics, loud rasgueados and needed to be played hard, VERY close to the bridge in order to have volume.
Classical, Strong sustain and the need of being played exactly on the sweet spot (close to the soundhole) in order to sing)

What you get is a very playable guitar which with the right tecnique can sound both flamenco and classical. It wont sound like PDLs first solo album and it wont sound like Baruecos playing Bach but it will sing. It wont be the best for Flamenco dance acc. and it wont be good for orchestral work, but it´ll sing

Some of the small old style spanish classical guitars with a design like Torres or Hauser can actually be very close but do normally have a bridge setup that makes them unusable for flamenco.

I have made two. I cant remember where the first is (Its not in England or Scotland) the second is in Singapore. I liked both but they are not my style of guitar. I could imagine building one with cypres backs and sides would be very interesting and more lyrical. Maybe with a cedar top.



Anders Eliasson -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 17:57:02)

quote:

6. Perhaps most crucially you seem to have assumed that drunken logic is terribly witty. Sorry no.Whatever is frustrating you in you real life or whoever your imaginary image of me ( clearly you haven't the foggiest idea who I actually am ) resembles (maybe a small minded violin teacher?) I am not to blame.


David, I dont get this one, but I accept it. We all need to get things out once in a while and I asked for it.[;)]

BTW, its 18.00 hours here in Huelva and I´m going to se Scotland - Italy now in the telly. (I´m on Scotlands side. I hate Italian futball (exept AC Milan))



guitarbuddha -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 18:21:09)

Thats me trying to be clever, never pull it off as well as I hope.

I hope it is a good game, my hand aches today with the change in the weather (dark, cold and stormy.... Scottish weather does seem to shape its people ), I wish I was in Huelva.

D.



Sherman -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 18:50:38)

I've been following this topic with much interest, can't say I fully understand it all, but still it is interesting. Some observations from an old Guild classical spruce top from the 60's may be interesting. Anyhow, this guitar is a Mark 2, which I bought used in Arizona about three years ago. It has a smaller much shallower body than my other classicals, almost flamenco in appearance, but that's where the similarity ends. At the saddle the height of the strings over the top was about 14 mm. My guess is some of this was caused by the raising of the top behind the bridge, because there is a significant "dome" there". So I thought it best to reduce some of the tension on the guitar by lowering the saddle a mm. So now it is about 13 mm at the saddle from the strings to the soundboard. Action height at the 12th fret is about 3.75 mm on the bass side. It plays very well, no buzzing at all except on the bass side above the 15th fret where it makes an odd noise when fretting as though the string is contacting frets on both sides, but I can live with that. Anyhow, just my observations on an old classical guitar which I happen to like a lot.

Sherman



bahen -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 18:55:32)

Excellent show of character - the both of you! It takes a lot to apologise and admit wrongdoing generally, and it takes even greater character to be able to apologise from a position of expertise. Oftentimes, and this is a huge turn-off, people with any sort of expertise in any field snub their noses at too many people; they feel like gods among men, unfortunately, which makes it all the more risible in more broad contexts. I would be doubly proud to be an own of an Anders, not only because I've heard it sounds true to the spirit of flamenco, but also because the character behind its construction had a humbling sense of humility!

No need to apologise for derailing the thread. I've learnt a fair bit already. I intend to purchase a few saddles, and experiment with different heights.

Warmly,
b.h.



Ricardo -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 21:34:21)

quote:

IMHO opinion, a VERY good setup will be some 7 - 8mm string above the soundboard at the bridge, 8 - 9 mm at the soundhole and 6th string above the 12th fret around 3mm.


Wow I just measured my Conde negra, the one everyone likes best, and that is EXACTLY the set up. Hair under 8 at the bridge, 9.5 at the hole. 3 at the 12th. This guitar does not have the easiest action of all my guitars, nor the weakest or loudest volume. But it is pretty much perfect for everyone that tries it. Break angle is extremely shallow.

The other negra is,
10mm at the bridge, 10.5 or less at the hole, and 2mm at the 12th. Much easier action, sound is still good, but more buzz of course. Despite the MUCH steeper break angle over the bone, the guitar is not louder than the other. They are close perhaps the other is a bit louder, but again I attribute that to it having a little more bass. Both guitars have GREAT mid range.

Regarding classical flamenco hybrids, I think that either of these guitars (I described above) with a higher bone and different strings brand (like Daddario hard tension), Slow Bach would come off great. I think one could do well with a flamenco negra, and just different bone and strings for "classical" mode. (I am talking for folks that absolutely MUST have only one instrument for both).

Likewise, I think a Hauser with a low bone, tap plate or one of those static cling on plastic protectors, and some La Bella 820's, would make a great flamenco. Problems is the initial set up of the bridge won't allow for a real low bone with out total buzzing. I actually started learning flamenco on a Ramirez 1a with my own tap plate put on. That was tough! Rasgueados were never sounding right until I got the right kind of guitar.



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:07:23)

OMG How I hate these games of the silly human race.

What have we got? A guitarbuilder who wants to take care of his business, careful with his words.And a highlander that wants to be a flamenco, heavy metal and classical player all in one without backing up anything. Except for looooooong, long posts.

Ooooh and now they decide to be friends. Oooooh. Goochie, goochie goo.[:D]

Nothing to do with nobility IMO. Just say it like it is guys.[;)]



Ron.M -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:21:07)

Koella,
I think this is a bit of an internet misunderstanding myself.
I think that in a lot of places where Anders said "you", he actually meant "one".
(third person) and GB took it as a personal assault.

If Simon is designing a new Personal Upload Forum, maybe he could add a new "Fight Forum" as well? [:D][:D]

cheers,

Ron



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:37:08)

Fighting Ron ?[&:]

When I read through this thread, I see some things that don't make sense.
I hope that Anders is actually more sensible then occurs in his replies.

Otherwise he's more weenie then I thought. Or a smooth businessman of course.[:D]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:45:23)

Respectless.
Is what I would like to add to it.

I mean I've been a troll many times, but I never made any respected foro member kneel for me.[;)]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:49:48)

Or did I ?...[8|]

****, I can't remember.[>:]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 17 2007 23:52:29)

They must already have been on the ground when I started to talk.

Yes, that's probably it.[:)]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 0:01:40)

I guess that makes me an Angel.
Because Clapton is God already.[&:]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 0:03:07)

Btw. How would that sound in other religions ?
Clapton is Buddha ?

Ok, I'll stop now.



wiglebot -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 0:59:00)

My action on my PdL negra is 2.2 mm at 12th fret and I never adjusted it. It is easy to play and the reason I bought it is because it could bridge genres (mellower flamenco). It is loud in regards to what one would expect from a mellow (less expensive) flamenco.

I decided to get it when I read Miles Davis explaining that it takes a kinda nerve to allow the notes to die off and have silence instead of working the sustain from note to note. I knew a Flamenco Negra would work. But it does take a lot of work finding the different sweet spots.



HemeolaMan -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 1:09:27)

i think the egyptians wouldve said "clapton is Ma'at"
which would make you... horus i believe.



Anders Eliasson -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 22:26:19)

Koella... I´ve never been known as a smooth and diplomatic type. You know that.
When I reread my own post, I realized that it was way to onesided and I agree with David that it was respectless.

I agree with the missunderstandings, but mostly on the subject. I might be wrong, but I have a feeling that what is being said is that a guitars volume is something objective. I dont think it is. Simply because what is interesting is the volume of a player playing a guitar. Not the guitar itself. The pulsation and playing style of the player has to go with the guitar. If not, you find any volume even in the loudest guitar.

Besides why all this volume. Proyection and dynamics are a lot more interesting.

With respect of fighting, I dont think this has to do with fighting. Noone got hurt (I hope) Just a Highlander and a Viking in the need of showing their swords[8D]



koella -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 18 2007 23:31:39)

Allright Anders.[:D]



bahen -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 19 2007 8:52:01)

Keeping on the issue of volume, I was wondering whether there's a substantive difference in loudness between lacquer and French polished guitars. Any difference in tone? Pros and cons of each?



RobJe -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 19 2007 20:33:29)

If you get the chance to go to Madrid you can check this out at the Conde Felipe V shop. At certain times of the year you might get the chance to try 6 A26s in lacquer and another 6 with FP. There is a clear and significant difference in sound. Once you have had the chance to try a few you could spot the difference with your eyes closed. But how to describe the difference ....?
Rob



n85ae -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 19 2007 21:45:31)

Anders,

I don't think you need to make such an apology. Maybe you were a bit blunt, but
on the other hand David tends to word things with a certain tone as well. In all
honesty if anything I think his reponse was a bit defensive in my opinion.

What's the world coming to when people can't just laugh and tell each other to
simply just f-off. :)

Now take back that blasted apology, and let's all get back to business as usual.

Regards,
Jeff



guitarbuddha -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 19 2007 22:34:00)

F@ck off Jeff !!!!!!!!!!

[:D]



n85ae -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 20 2007 4:06:25)

Yeah, Exactly! :)

Jeff



Anders Eliasson -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 20 2007 9:29:41)

Jeff.

You dont take apologies back, you just bash the guy[8D]

I actually felt what I did and dont feel like taking anything back. Btw, I got back to business some days ago.



bahen -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 20 2007 11:29:43)

I don't have a trip booked to Madrid, so that won't help.

Sorry to interrupt the rest of you going on and on about I forgot what, but any thoughts on the difference in tone, sound, and volume between lacquer and French polished guitars?



Fitna A. -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 20 2007 12:15:57)

quote:

I dont' understand the physics but, lowering the strings closer to the board, makes the guitar lose a little volume (you would think the opposite!).



It's the lever of the bridge.

Stringoscillation causes a tensiondifference between the nut and the saddle. The bridge gets the function of a lever to get the soundboard moving.
A highter bridge transport the oscillation to the soundboard more effective than a low bridge



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



Ricardo -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 21 2007 19:10:47)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fitna A.

quote:

I dont' understand the physics but, lowering the strings closer to the board, makes the guitar lose a little volume (you would think the opposite!).



It's the lever of the bridge.

Stringoscillation causes a tensiondifference between the nut and the saddle. The bridge gets the function of a lever to get the soundboard moving.
A highter bridge transport the oscillation to the soundboard more effective than a low bridge




Ok, I see now. So the break angle behind the bridge is not necessarily the thing then. That makes more sense based on experience. I have seen guitars with shallow break but high action that are still louder than guitars with a steep break and very low action.

Also, low action guitars even with high bridge are not always loud, probably because when the strings buzz by hitting the frets, the oscillation is not allowed to be so efficient. (?) So, I think the neck/fingerboard angle and height has something to do with it too. Meaning, these guitars with raised fingerboard and super high bridges, are not super loud guitars (like Humphrey millenium). So higher tension strings regain volume on low action guitars. Anyway, just my thoughts, not based on any real physics.

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



itoprover -> RE: Volume and lowering the action (Nov. 22 2007 1:05:55)

I think this is a "give and get" kind of thing: playability for volume and vice versa - there is a "golden middle" but it is different for every guitar and player. I just had a new saddle made which raised the action on my guitar from
2.0mm to 2.5mm on the 12th fret and the differnce in volume is VERY noticable (break angle is very sharp if it matters). I also had to switch from high to normal tension (D'Addario EJ45) and now they feel like hard tension with action set on 2mm - not sure if this is normal...



Page: <<   <   1 [2] 3    >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET