Ricardo -> RE: Question about Paco de Lucia (Sep. 23 2007 7:01:53)
|
quote:
i am not sure how it was recived by the majority of the Paco lovers here or in Spain ? Not unlike the Beatles, you have a guy that has recorded a lot, and now is not out to prove anything about guitar playing, but be a bit artistic. I felt the same about Zyrab. A mix of stuff, and some extras thrown in because there was not a complete concept or enough traditional forms that he considered "new" and forward moving. I mean with Cositas you have obvious use of studio editing technique vs simply playing a guitar solo. On Luzia you have some real guitar playing by itself. The idea of accompanying Camaron with salvaged tracks is not really "flamenco", but very beautiful and artistic in its own special way. I felt the only new "form" on here was Tientos, but there was not whole lot of music to devour or study like on Luzia you had all new forms of solea, siguiriyas, Rondeña, etc. I personally love the first bulerias the best on the album and the guitar duet that has a great south american feel, but neither one to me is a move forward from his previous work. Just more good stuff. He does some cool remates in Volar that you don't normally see from him, very baile ish, but they really jump out at you from what is happening with the falsetas. quote:
Isnt La Tumbona mainly in phyrygian chords everything? Well in the new things i cant see that. Its much less resolution in phrygian (i guess). I don't mean you can take newest falsetas and stick them into "La tumbona", but rather, you can play La tumbona material mixed with Paco's latest, and it blends nicely. Where as if he played falsetas and compas strumming rasgueados etc from the era of Fantasia or Fuente, it would really jump out at you as old school. Hope that makes sense? Ricardo
|
|
|
|