Counting approach (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - Counting approach: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=363324



Message


metalhead -> Counting approach (May 13 2026 10:59:53)

I have always been a metronome guy but have incorporated playing with compas loops too.

I have seen that for more intuitively phrased falsetas like the ones by PDL, playing with compas loops is not difficult once I have already practiced the falseta a good amount with the metronome.

But for highly syncopated falsetas and falsetas with 'unintuitive' rhthym, I find it difficult to play with compas loops.

Right now, my strategy is to choose a few 'checkpoints' in the falseta. For example, if a particular note in the falseta falls on a beat like 6, 8 or 10, I keep a check when playing whether my playing coincides with the compas loop.

The rest, I rely on intuition and filling gaps with small upstrokes. Is this a good approach? Do you need to keep track of every single beat while playing?

What I mean by unintuitive and intuitive: if you have learnt PDL's falsetas, then you might have seen how his falseta 'sings' with the compas. Contrarily, highly syncopated falsetas don't have this 'singing' thing going on with their rhythm. Or maybe I am not advanced enough to feel their singing, I could be wrong.

The question is specifically for Bulerias.




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 14 2026 11:54:24)

quote:

The rest, I rely on intuition and filling gaps with small upstrokes. Is this a good approach? Do you need to keep track of every single beat while playing?


You should at least understand the need to keep track of every beat and every subdivision in-between, very precisely and lucidly. Over time you won't need to do that and just "feel it", but even the top dogs have the odd ball phrase they created from intuition that was simply off mathematically. That is because they only feel subdivision and accents and don't intellectualize the counts. There are examples especially in bulerías of odd 3 count phrases resulting in ambiguous 9 or 15 count compás expressions, by Niño Ricardo, Sabicas, Manuel Morao (more so in Siguiriyas than bulería), Niño Miguel, even Paco de Lucía, probably others that I don't know about. Moraito was in a master class where he could not get the math straight on an old siguiriya thing that was simply off mathematically. There is also a 14 count fandango phrase I first heard from Felix de Utrera that is repeated often by Moraito.

So feeling it intuitively is the ultimate goal, but it can also fool even the best that everything is "correct" simply because it "feels correct". As a teacher of this stuff, when a student wants one of those ambiguous ones I have to take liberty to correct it so it works out either as a half of whole compás, and make them aware what exactly I changed (added or subtracted something) for the sake of authenticity.




Bulerias2005 -> RE: Counting approach (May 14 2026 21:46:37)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

quote:

The rest, I rely on intuition and filling gaps with small upstrokes. Is this a good approach? Do you need to keep track of every single beat while playing?


You should at least understand the need to keep track of every beat and every subdivision in-between, very precisely and lucidly. Over time you won't need to do that and just "feel it", but even the top dogs have the odd ball phrase they created from intuition that was simply off mathematically. That is because they only feel subdivision and accents and don't intellectualize the counts. There are examples especially in bulerías of odd 3 count phrases resulting in ambiguous 9 or 15 count compás expressions, by Niño Ricardo, Sabicas, Manuel Morao (more so in Siguiriyas than bulería), Niño Miguel, even Paco de Lucía, probably others that I don't know about. Moraito was in a master class where he could not get the math straight on an old siguiriya thing that was simply off mathematically. There is also a 14 count fandango phrase I first heard from Felix de Utrera that is repeated often by Moraito.

So feeling it intuitively is the ultimate goal, but it can also fool even the best that everything is "correct" simply because it "feels correct". As a teacher of this stuff, when a student wants one of those ambiguous ones I have to take liberty to correct it so it works out either as a half of whole compás, and make them aware what exactly I changed (added or subtracted something) for the sake of authenticity.

I remember being so surprised when I discovered this as a kid/teenager. Goes to show that everyone is mortal at the end of the day, but more than anything a really interesting reflection on how being methodical vs intuitive can intersect at any stage of one's artistic development.




metalhead -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 14:12:49)

quote:

You should at least understand the need to keep track of every beat and every subdivision in-between, very precisely and lucidly.


Are you saying, that right now, I should keep track of every beat when playing with compas loops even with the more syncopated falsetas?




devilhand -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 16:09:05)

quote:

Are you saying, that right now, I should keep track of every beat when playing with compas loops even with the more syncopated falsetas?

Yes. This is a simple exercise for a 16th note subdivision. You can make it complicated by mixing different beats in one measure.
For example e ah (2nd and 4th beat) followed by 2 ah (1st and 4th beat); e (2nd beat); 4 & ah (1st, 3rd and 4th beat) and so on.





Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 16:17:38)

quote:

ORIGINAL: metalhead

quote:

You should at least understand the need to keep track of every beat and every subdivision in-between, very precisely and lucidly.


Are you saying, that right now, I should keep track of every beat when playing with compas loops even with the more syncopated falsetas?

[edited]....yes.....




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 16:23:35)

4:45 is the important point to take home.

Notice at 7 minutes it is the standard rumba accent. Yet it is the one everyone screwed up here. And Rumba is the inferior easy rhythm expression of flamenco, right??




metalhead -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 16:36:17)

lol what do you mean "you? especially"? I have improved a ton.




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 19:18:23)

quote:

ORIGINAL: metalhead

lol what do you mean "you? especially"? I have improved a ton.


oh shoot, I thought you were Devilhand!! my bad. [:D][:D][:D][:D]




rombsix -> RE: Counting approach (May 25 2026 20:29:43)

quote:

oh shoot, I thought you were Devilhand!! my bad.


I had a feeling that's what was happening. Poor American cheese thick slice golpeador kid. [8D]




devilhand -> RE: Counting approach (May 26 2026 8:13:26)

quote:

Rumba is the inferior easy rhythm expression of flamenco, right??

Actually I'm a big fan of rumba rhythm pattern. Many pop songs have rumba/son clave beats 1; 2&; 4.
In rumba strumming accents fall on these 3 beats.




metalhead -> RE: Counting approach (May 26 2026 11:23:58)

makes sense, no problem.




metalhead -> RE: Counting approach (May 26 2026 11:26:16)

the one with an accent on the "a" just before beat 2? Like 1 e & "a" 2?

I have never played rumba so I must not be familiar but can you give examples of this happening?

How is that humanely possible to do in rumba? From the little bit I know about rumba, it seems to be played 180-220ish zone. In such a case, doing such an awkward syncopation for a 16th note at such a high tempo looks quite challenging.




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 26 2026 12:09:43)

quote:

ORIGINAL: metalhead

the one with an accent on the "a" just before beat 2? Like 1 e & "a" 2?

I have never played rumba so I must not be familiar but can you give examples of this happening?

How is that humanely possible to do in rumba? From the little bit I know about rumba, it seems to be played 180-220ish zone. In such a case, doing such an awkward syncopation for a 16th note at such a high tempo looks quite challenging.


No, it is the same as the demonstrated tempo, but Rumba is in 2/4 not 4/4. Simply combine accents used at 6:59 with the one used at 4:10 and repeat those for beats 3 and 4 (technically two bars of 2).




metalhead -> RE: Counting approach (May 26 2026 21:10:46)

cool, makes sense.




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (May 27 2026 11:49:47)

quote:

How is that humanely possible to do in rumba? From the little bit I know about rumba, it seems to be played 180-220ish zone


Even though I was talking about half time expression, you can double time the subdivision in rumba and it is still "humanly possible". Here at 3:05 Al dimeola does an alternate picking figure 4 times as what would be 32nd notes in the slower rumba, so a double time rumba if you will. It is still a cool sound and if you can move your fingers that fast the expression is very clear: at 3:05



The pattern he is doing to make the rumba phrase is G-F-E, G-F-E, F-E, repeat.




zendalex -> RE: Counting approach (May 30 2026 15:20:20)

Just wanted to share my afficionado's 2c.
I was asking similar questions to J. McGuire, Pedro Cortes and El Amir. With the latter two I personally studied and with McGuire we had a web-site where we could ask questions.

J. McGuire: guiarists should be always aware where exactly in compas they currently are
El Amir: you should try to play towards the main accents before you start messing with the syncopation
Pedro Cortes: put a metronome and make your own exercise in which, say in buleria, you emphasize a given beat out 12 with a downstroke or 2-finger (m,i) rasgueo.

I'd say #1 is where we want to be eventually but to get there we can try those "awareness" approaches from #2 and #3.


quote:

ORIGINAL: metalhead

I have always been a metronome guy but have incorporated playing with compas loops too.

I have seen that for more intuitively phrased falsetas like the ones by PDL, playing with compas loops is not difficult once I have already practiced the falseta a good amount with the metronome.

But for highly syncopated falsetas and falsetas with 'unintuitive' rhthym, I find it difficult to play with compas loops.

Right now, my strategy is to choose a few 'checkpoints' in the falseta. For example, if a particular note in the falseta falls on a beat like 6, 8 or 10, I keep a check when playing whether my playing coincides with the compas loop.

The rest, I rely on intuition and filling gaps with small upstrokes. Is this a good approach? Do you need to keep track of every single beat while playing?

What I mean by unintuitive and intuitive: if you have learnt PDL's falsetas, then you might have seen how his falseta 'sings' with the compas. Contrarily, highly syncopated falsetas don't have this 'singing' thing going on with their rhythm. Or maybe I am not advanced enough to feel their singing, I could be wrong.

The question is specifically for Bulerias.




Stu -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 1 2026 15:08:33)

quote:

The rest, I rely on intuition and filling gaps with small upstrokes.


quote:

The question is specifically for Bulerias.


This video seems to be fun and accesible and very helpful.



no counting, just doing, feeling.

quote:

J. McGuire: guiarists should be always aware where exactly in compas they currently are
El Amir: you should try to play towards the main accents before you start messing with the syncopation
Pedro Cortes: put a metronome and make your own exercise in which, say in buleria, you emphasize a given beat out 12 with a downstroke or 2-finger (m,i) rasgueo.


I think this video can help with all of these




devilhand -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 8:23:33)

quote:

no counting, just doing, feeling.

This guy is doing golpe with his ring finger.




Stu -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 10:32:55)

[:D] I believe the saying goes....."this isn't the win you think it is"




Ricardo -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 12:06:47)

quote:

This guy is doing golpe with his ring finger.


Excellent observation, so this guy is either from Jerez and lying, or, the ring finger golpe originates in Chile (ida y Vuelta). [&:][8|]




zendalex -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 17:13:37)

Is it not how everybody else does it??

quote:

ORIGINAL: devilhand

quote:

no counting, just doing, feeling.

This guy is doing golpe with his ring finger.




zendalex -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 17:18:04)

Thanks, I'd say to go further and put accents at less obvious places and do the same thing.
And I also find it is fun to do 2-finger m-i rasgueo followed by i+golpe on the accented beat.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stu


This video seems to be fun and accesible and very helpful.






Stu -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 18:32:34)

quote:

Is it not how everybody else does it??


You obviously missed devilhands golpe revelation thread.

[:D]




rombsix -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 2 2026 18:33:01)

quote:

the ring finger golpe originates in Chile (ida y Vuelta)


[:D][8D]




Stu -> RE: Counting approach (Jun. 3 2026 11:32:03)

quote:

Thanks, I'd say to go further and put accents at less obvious places and do the same thing.
And I also find it is fun to do 2-finger m-i rasgueo followed by i+golpe on the accented beat.


Yes agreed, I was doing such stuff when practicing. But i think part of the point is keeping it simple especially for people who are early in the journey of trying to feel bulerias.
but yes why not develop it too.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET