Ricardo -> RE: Flamenco standards!? (Apr. 2 2025 14:36:54)
|
http://www.foroflamenco.com/tm.asp?m=177910&appid=&p=&mpage=1&key=standards&tmode=&smode=&s=#177910 I realize it is a short thread and I did not contribute, and felt pretty much like Morante that the palos ARE the standards. However, the palos are easy to "improvise" with cantaores, but there are in fact some set cantes that need to be on the ready (aka, not easy to learn in the traditional format of a juerga or whatever) that are fairly ubiquitous. Things like Tangos de Malaga, the Camaron "huapangos", La Perla "cuple" (and a big etc., there for bulerias), Tanguillo de Cadiz, Colombianas of marchena, Garrotin, Alegrias de Cordoba, Zambras of Caracol....I don't know man, it is a huge subject. For instrumentals, I have played Vicente's tres notas, Spain (as mentioned in the thread), PDL rumbas, etc., with strangers on stage, no rehearsal. Ketama seems very popular amongst gen X Spaniards, I know this because I never really got into them but have been on stage and expected to just know that (Vente pa Madrid at least). There are also the old boleros and coplas like Paco recorded on his final album that seem to be known by ALL flamencos, and I never got into that at all, being a foreigner I guess. I still don't get why every flamenco artist knows those. There are also a lot of standard Sevillanas. There are also many standardized letras for baile, the macho letras, estribillos for fandangos, many libre introductions etc. As I said, a huge subject.
|
|
|
|