RobF -> RE: Which crack is acceptable (Feb. 18 2025 15:20:08)
|
To reiterate a question posed in a previous thread...why buy problems? If you must... The crack by the bridge is likely no big deal but it does need attention from a repair person. Things like this really can't be properly assessed remotely. The guitar must be inspected in hand and things like the bracing pattern, climate, etc have to be taken into account. Personally I think I'm going to stop responding to requests like this. I always end up suggesting the instrument be inspected by a qualified tech, at any rate. The second edge crack is due to blunt force trauma. Of the two it's the less concerning. But, again, it needs to be inspected in hand by a qualified tech. Yes, the crack can be repaired and cleated, but the location and extent of it has to be taken into account. It's sometimes not so easy to repair lower bout issues like that if they're as far away from the soundhole as can get. The repair requires being able to touch and see the problem from the inside. The more difficult that is, the more difficult the repair. I realize you're looking for a travel guitar and also that you are an accomplished guitarist. But maybe the money would be better spent on a less "top-end" instrument in perfect shape rather than a compromised one? At some point you'll want to sell it and repairs do affect value. Plus the cost of repair should be considered as part of the purchase price (maybe not so cheap, after all?). Also, I've seen some affordable factory made instruments that only needed some setup attention to end up punching way above their pay grade in being solid, good performing instruments. For travel, couldn't this be an avenue to consider?
|
|
|
|