XXX -> RE: Words of wisdom from Phillip Hii (oh, come on...) (Apr. 20 2006 22:40:13)
|
Ok, keep on judging me on superficial factors. I could still give you reasons why I think that poem is completely ****, as I often have given you reasons, but you are never satisfied. You always turn it into a question of authority; hence, any discussion with you is useless (a serious discussion on a TOPIC), unless... haha well, unless you are someone who is respected by you. Not my position is ignorant. Your position is ignorant because you are able to ignore everything said and try to critisize the person more than his opinions, not based on arguments, but on moral attitude. To sum it all up in one sentence: Right or wrong is not a question of the person, who states it, but a question of the reasons and explanations he can give for it. What you dont want to understand is, that a Taxi driver can very well explain the theory of relativity whereas a physician would stand in front of you and make "blubb"... This is possible, even if its not probable. The point here in this poem is a bit different. I know highly enough about instincts, to tell if it is a good idea to "follow them". Ps: If it is really a problem of knowledge, then you could EASILY solve this problem, by saying which information would be necessary, and which Im lacking of, that prevents me to state that something is right or wrong. But you dont, because you dont want to talk on a subject, but more to morally demolish me, who dared to try a rational discussion, and ONLY based on rationality, apart from authorities. Ps2: Claiming I wouldnt know anything at all is wrong as well as if I would claim of knowing everything, which I never did. But again, this is not a question of knowledge. If so, you would have answered differently.
|
|
|
|