Ricardo -> RE: Canina- book club reading of Moors Pericón de Cortez (Feb. 22 2023 12:43:38)
|
Some things to keep in mind, or at least I do when reading. This discussion of poverty leads one to envision that traveling caravan gypsy clan, and that from this free roaming group springs forth our flamenco music and cante. These types of people did not settle down and mix it up with payos in the region of Spain where flamenco music is concentrated. We see a mixing of a class group, we could say poor people, but also could find some work together, so I see it as a working class of sorts, and going pretty far back the integration and mixing is already well established. These are cities pretty big, and if you have seen Leblon books about Gitanos, we see the enormous concentration of the gitano population of Spain (starting from the census back in 1785), in Cadiz, Sevilla, and Malaga. Music, including this cante, manages to transcend boundaries between classes and races, as it levels the playing field of the Corazon. The statement about politics jumps into the book a little bit, but again, in my mind is already the story of Paco de Lucia, and even our divisive social media situation today. People get on the side of some line and this seems to go way back and continue to similar degrees of intensity. PDL casually mentioned left and right hand roles on the guitar, which was interpreted politically, and he was jumped on the street and they wanted to crush his right hand for implying the Right is mindless executioner. So Pericon hid under the bed, nothing has changed even today. And looking back, maybe nothing has changed in CENTURIES. Paco admits in his last documentary, (tying in to the political thing), that when they were hungry in Cadiz, the music was a means to an end, where if he excelled he might be able to feed the family. This drove his political ideology as well, rich folk being the enemy of the poor. But suddenly Paco found himself with food in his stomach, and money in the bank, and did his socially conscious ideology force him to build a school or donate $ to Africa? NO. So feeling as a hypocrite himself, he stopped spouting any political stuff. There are haves, and have nots, and such is life. I wanted to move forward then through the intros because they all address things we will encounter in the book. I can’t find the article but I came across an Ortiz Nuevo thing (about Romances I believe) where he expresses a distaste for the the flamencological community, where he wanted to start producing his finding, or publishing them, anonymously due to have ideas blocked then later stolen. I remember thinking what a pain in the as5. As an artist myself, who actually never put stock in the study of flamenco (there was a term I heard early on “flamencaholicos”) that would look earlier than the first audio recordings, and this was reinforced by the artists I worked with. If you can’t do palmas, what are you talking about of value in regards to the art form? First learn it the way we all have to (the hard way) then we can talk about medieval times. Over the years I have changed my view. These kind of anecdotal stories have their charm, but we actually need to look at them seriously because they are coming from minds that KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. Ortiz Nuevo makes a disclaimer that this must be viewed as “impressionistic”, and should not have flamencological value interms of events and dates, etc. He is totally lying for the sake of that group of flamencoaholics that want to point to talking dogs and what not as “lets toss the baby out with the bath water here, fake news”. Well, after seeing interesting evidence that predates audio recordings, and reading books by Borrow and Estebañez Calderon, etc., I absolutely feel the OPPOSITE. That what is in here is a treasure of truth and deep meaning that needs to be taken seriously. Take the talking dog…when we get to that story, it was little more than a very realistic scenario that a dog used its basic sense of smell to find Pericon and bark at him, which, since he was guilty after all, shocked and frightened the kid. Where is the exaggeration there really? Where there is smoke, there is fire. So I take it as “read everything with a grain of salt”, sure, but very likely a lot of this is TRUE stories told through a lens of DEEP, lucid, understanding.
|
|
|
|