Ricardo -> RE: Please check out my friend and subscribe to him (Jun. 25 2020 18:17:05)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rombsix Solid. How is he not getting into copyright troubles on YouTube / in general (with Vicente) though? I see he's from Cordoba, so perhaps a friend of Vicente's? Fair use clause traditionally covered or allowed for tutorials, however things have changed. Rick Beato talks extensively (complains) about the state of things on youtube. Basically they have bots or loser humans hired to scan the search band for red flag-able things and elements that MIGHT be violations. Next they force the uploader (regardless if they are in the right or not) to allow an advertisement which the supposed (c) owner can then collect advertising royalty for. Rarely (or never?) does a true (c) owner or composer flag somebody’s video anymore. In most cases the true owner (it HAS to be a publisher even if it’s a self published artist) is not the person flagging anything. Counter claims are lost in cyberspace. There is no human to get on the phone with to talk about it. To be fair when **** was out of control in the past (people ripping commercially available DVDs and such, destroying the market honestly, and uploading like crazy) this solution to force advertising made sense. But now things have reversed and there are people out there ripping off true artists and teachers. Here is a funny example in my case. I have a private video of my live performance of my Flamenco arrangement of Bach Chaconne written in 1720. Despite it being public domain, plus my unique arrangement in Flamenco style, AND private setting only viewed by myself a few times, some damn robot or something flagged it, and some a s s holes out there are collecting royalties from some poor shmuck advertising company or product, everytime I watch it!!! 😂
|
|
|
|