hhmusic -> RE: What is it about a negra? (Jul. 24 2017 8:06:30)
|
quote:
I'm going to try an "ultralight negra" using some low density Italian spruce, and a lower density Indian rosewood set of back and sides, to see if that will tend more to the blanca end of the spectrum. Well, having built exactly zero guitars, but having played many dozens, from dozens of makers, my impressions are that: Rosewood is heavier, stiffer and more resonant, and a guitar made from it has a stiffer feel under the right hand in particular, a longer sustain, a boomier voice, and as Andy mentioned, more bass and high treble and less in the middle. I agree with Stephen: I don't like it. Of the many Indian rosewood negras I've played, there were only 2 I actually liked -- and I bought them. Yes, I'm finally getting to my point... They're both quite a bit lighter than most negras. Closer to but not quite like a cypress guitar, with just a bit more robustness, which I do like. SO, I would think if you went for an ultralight, or at least lighter weight, negra, that would yield a more 'flamenco' guitar. That would be my vote. Side note: On the Janka chart it appears that EIR is harder than BRW. I have played more BRW negras that I liked than EIR negras, in fact have come to the conclusion that EIR usually doesn't make a good flamenco. Maybe the hardness also affects the sound negatively. Other side note: I think walnut has promise. Lighter weight, easy to work, beautiful, appropriate color for a negra, available in great quality for reasonable prices, and comes from right here in the USA. I've heard eastern black walnut is better than California / claro, again because it's lighter. Anyway, that's my free advice -- it may be worth what you paid for it!
|
|
|
|