Flamenco para discutir (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - Flamenco para discutir: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=295312



Message


Morante -> Flamenco para discutir (Aug. 21 2016 15:41:58)

Franco ruined flamenco. When he was alive, Spain was closed to the outside world and flamenco was "puro".

Outside of Spain, the postwar blues scene in London spawned Alexis Korner and the Rolling Stones, while
the radio and tv brought Everly Bros etc.

When the great dictador died, the floodgates to the modern world opened and Spain changed forever.

There was an incredible musical movement in Madrid, lots of groups such as Dynamic Duo, copying badly the Everlys, Loquillo a bad copy of Elvis and the incredibly hortera Alaska etc.

Sadly artistas of the calibre of Raimundo, Manzanita or Camaron fell into this trap. Camaron met with Pachon y Humanes y co., just as Elvis met with Col Parker. Money before arte.

After Pachon, Camaron´s recording history is of flamenquito, beginning with Leyendas del Tiempo, many records were prerecorded in the studio with the voice of Pepe de Lucía, which Camarón, who was super dotado, could learn after only one listening and then record his personal style over the prerecorded backing.

Since Camerón was regarded as Dios by young gitanos, they began to copy this style, so that not even los gitanos are preserving their heritage.

Curiously, in his actuaciones en directo with Tomatito, Camaron always sang flamenco, de Chaqueta, de la Perla etc. I have seen him en directo and he was really impressionante.

Meanwhile Paco de Lucía was inventing a toque de virtuoso, which has led to hundreds of super technical guitarists who are poco flamenco.

So the apertura of España was the death knell for flamenco and the birth of flamenquito. But it led to freedom and better social conditions (until the arrival of Europa)

Good or bad? Who can say.

Discuss
[:D]




Piwin -> [Deleted] (Aug. 21 2016 15:59:31)

Post has been moved to the Recycle Bin at Aug. 21 2016 16:01:13




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco para discutir (Aug. 21 2016 17:20:06)

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that Franco's death (not Franco himself as dictator) ruined flamenco by resulting in the opening up of Spain to outside influences that have led to the demise of "flamenco puro" and replacing it with what you term "poco flamenco" or "flamenquito." I think I understand what you are driving at, and I guess whether that is a good thing or bad thing with regard to the development of flamenco depends on where you stand regarding "flamenco puro" vs. a more modern style of flamenco.

I will say unequivocally, though, that the opening up of Spain was a good thing, both for the Spanish and for the rest of Europe and the world. And while I tend to like the more traditional forms of flamenco, without the additional annoying instruments and the sometimes over-the-top dancing, there are many who like the modern stuff.

As a side note, however, I do think Spain made a very bad bet, not by joining the European Union, but by exchanging the peseta for the Euro. Spain lost its ability to set interest rates and depreciate its currency to increase exports and move its economy forward. The economies of the northern and southern members of the EU are too disparate to be compatible and operate under one currency. All that is moot, however, when I listen to early Paco Cepero.

Bill




Morante -> RE: Flamenco para discutir (Aug. 21 2016 17:56:45)

quote:

I do think Spain made a very bad bet, not by joining the European Union, but by exchanging the peseta for the Euro


You are quite right; everything which cost 20 duros (100 ptas) suddenly cost one euro (166ptas).

However it was not really possible to join the European Union without accepting the Euro (only England achieved this).

Now the rich and corrupt are richer and the poor are poorer. Still, I wouldn´t live anywhere else[:)]




Piwin -> [Deleted] (Aug. 21 2016 18:38:27)

Post has been moved to the Recycle Bin at Aug. 21 2016 23:23:56




gbv1158 -> RE: Flamenco para discutir (Aug. 21 2016 19:39:21)

quote:

Since Camerón was regarded as Dios by young gitanos, they began to copy this style, so that not even los gitanos are preserving their heritage.
(.....).
Meanwhile Paco de Lucía was inventing a toque de virtuoso, which has led to hundreds of super technical guitarists who are poco flamenco.


agree !



ciao
giambattista




Ricardo -> RE: Flamenco para discutir (Aug. 22 2016 16:45:31)

Disagree. Cameron and Paco already famous and influential and experimental before. Agree that Leyendo was commercial, but the ball was already rolling since early 70's. Camaroneros don't only copy flamenquito, the copy the Perla etc same as Camaron interpreted....so all inclusive. Further, the guitar influence of PDL produced many greats and inspired those that would have been involved otherwise, namely, MORAITO, that not one single aficionado would put down in the manner you have. But not only him, many others whether you like it or not. Even Cepero got good ideas for his toque from younger PDL.

IMO, the pressure to work or make $ as pro artist, going back to Franco time and before, gradually but quickly evolved cante via BAILE situations in a sort of artificial selection that forced it's demise. Remember along with Guitar the Baile also went avant guarde in a big way, with virtuoso stuff too. The pressure to sing specific letras a specific way gradually phased out the creativity and variety that used to allow the cante to flourish, such that it only existed puro at the amature level until successive generations were no longer interested in family traditions as much as popular culture.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET