Miguel de Maria -> Picado and coordination (Jan. 20 2006 21:42:39)
|
I was meditating on picado recently, and remembered some things I've read about coordination. What is it, essentially, that is difficult about good picado? 1. the RH and arm must perform rapid, precise patterns of movement 2. the LH and arm must perform rapid, precise patterns of movement which are assymetrical with the RH 3. these patterns, or more specifically their effects, must be coordinated to an incredibly precise degree to a specific rhythmic pulse If we agree with these, assumptions, we see that there is a lot to do. If you are looking at a run that is giving you trouble, you might ask where the problem occurs. Is it a fault of the RH, LH, coordination, or rhythm? Keep in mind that we can do something well with one hand, but if we are forced to repeat it while doing something else with the other hand, we lose efficiency. We may lose a good 20-50% of our efficiency when we split our attention. This is a good argument for hands-seperate practice. I have done a lot of RH only practice, but what about LH? It would seem just as important and worthy of study, if only to make it as sure-fingered as the RH. It may be true that if there is a weakness in either hand, that weakness will cause the body to seize up. That's when we stumble and the picado catches, or the hand tenses and misses a string. Caused by uncertainty. What about coordination? Probably the best way is to use an impartial observer, Ye Olde Metronome. The precision must be complete, you must make sure your strokes and frets are as accurate to the extent your senses will let you. The only way to determine this would be paying complete attention. The other way would be when you mess up, that will tell you if you are doing it right! It comes to mind there should be an automated picking machine, connected to a metronome. It could pick, say sixteenth notes at 120 bpm. Then your job would be to make the LH do its required actions for the scale to sound.
|
|
|
|