RE: Conde porn (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - RE: Conde porn: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=286753



Message

Sr. Martins -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 19:03:11)

quote:

What I didn't like though was that you assumed for some reason that I think that players who don't use F or G guitars are not pro or the guitars aren't good


That happened because you wrote sentences that led into that "assumption".


Let's see:


quote:

It's for the same reason why most pro guitarists who use electrics play with fender or gibson.


I said that MANY aren't playing F or G, to which you replied:

quote:

But it's true that there are new crappy guitarists that are considered greats.


Then it went through this:

quote:

Most electric guitarists still use gibson and fender



Finland message boards, your personal taste... and again, it all boils down to preference and not to the "unquestionable truths" you were trying to sell us.



beno -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 19:08:28)

I like how conde threads live on their own, and get unexpected ways.



DavRom -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 20:27:18)

un tema CONDEnado al olvido



Ruphus -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 21:24:50)

I´ve not been seen uttering something as dull like "let´s get back on topic"?

That was before aesthetics like these occured:


Wouldn´t had hurt if the builder I ordered from looked like her.
>scratch, scratch> Maybe I should sent it back?
... Oh wait, it hasn´t arrived yet.

Okey, I vote for this picture as the most aesthetical guitar building photography of all time. Regarding the craftsman, I mean.

Ruphus

PS:
Wondering; what could a luthier be holding the axe this way for? ... Removing excess glue at the heel maybe?

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px



Sr. Martins -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 21:32:34)

quote:

I´ve not been seen uttering something as dull like "let´s get back on topic"?


The topic is "Conde porn"... I think we should avoid the topic. [:D]



Ruphus -> RE: Conde porn (Jan. 17 2016 21:34:50)

Now, indeed! [8D] [:D]



Page: <<   <   1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET