Ruphus -> RE: Vive la France (Nov. 18 2015 4:29:20)
|
The start of Turks´ immigration into Germany might have differed a bit from other examples. For one it was still the times that the muslim world seemed about to explore new cultural approach, secondly in Ataturk´s aftermath for Turks anyway. I experienced the early immigrants as truly interested and humble. It appears to have been the German´s really brisk rejection that forced the Turks to forming ghettos in the most worn down and cheap quarters. I also experienced quite the contrary, Germans as totally dear, helpful and defending for "the gypsies" as basically any folks of dark hair and skin used to be named, but that was not the majority. And many private landlords took the opportunity to squeeze a crass hell of a rent for near dilapidated buildings out of the tenants who had no choice. It was really mercyless. There were also gross stories going round about Anatolians who´d wash their dishes in unseen toilet bowles and do the business in the staircase. Don´t know if that was really true, I remember to have been quite puzzled. - On the current topic and negative site: I think people who adore Hitler´s "Mein Kampf" and other literature of this demagogic genre are considered Nazis. Or have you ever heard public distinction between moderate and fanatic / radical /extremist Nazis? Consequently, it seems as if worshipping a doctrin that discriminates human beings and defines unworthy life, requesting repression and extermination is already radical, with moderation obviously not present within such sort of premise. So, considering the contents of the other book in question, adored by over a billion of people, I don´t comprehend western official statement that empasizes that they are not against its disciples, but only against their radicals? I have had plenty of inquiries with disciples, asking them how on earth they consider it good and legitimate to adore a doctrin that condemns and sends to hell people of other believe (lower even, completely innocent and exposed animals). Each time the disciples would deny such passages and insist on nothing thelike existing, even though the main book consisting of not much more than these kinds of constantly repeated curses, threats and instructions. So, that I had to prove the actual contents to them. It was flabbergasting to me, how people who live all around a writing don´t know what it actual says, and it took about five years until I got an idea about the people´s curious amnesia. I figure that in this culture it is simply no big deal to request extermination. Reading such contents apparently ignites so little of emotional impulse that the content passes by as is. (Know that memory works by emotional peaks. The higher the peak the more an impression will be memorized.) Such phenomenon of no big deal, would also correspond to the generally very little concern about doing injust. The mentality and individual of deeming immorality everywhere around, in the same time entertains an image of infaliability about itself, on course of which any own action is being bent into being appropriate and justified. Explaining a vast lack of remorse and the safety / unconcerned being about doing injustice. The condemning, issuing and persecuting with great ease. Evident also in the law that has no problem with allowing people to lie in court, deemed as ligit measure of defence, on the other hand treating as guilty beforehand any defendant. (Until proven free of guilt.) The principle of: "What you don´t want to be done to you, don´t do to others", is not present in this underdeveloped construct, with correspondingly extreme effects. Ruphus
|
|
|
|