Ruphus -> RE: Keeping abreast of things? (Sep. 29 2015 14:00:01)
|
Here we go. Unlike from what the privileged proclaim through bluring opinion makers, their way of conduct does effect the whole of the world elementarily. Not "just" for their 1% of population up from next year owning / occupying more than the rest of the earth´s people. But because of policies they impose on the world that are aligned to serve their own preservation and expansion. By nature of the matter, power serving privilegeds will be power against community and common interests like on environment. It is a power that alienates instances meant to be for the whole of people, like states or international orgs, turning them into executives of minorities. It is a power that prevents a free development of science and recognition, of technological efficiency and general benefit. It is a power that not only groundworks for selfish aims of a few, but always on short-term / neglecting long-term perspective. It is intrinsic regime of sabotage and triviality, no matter whether in patent or latent dictature of privilegeds. All the countering of anthropolgical, intellectual and material state of humanity comes from it. It is this triviality´s reign that bestows paradox on human potential. This triviality has us in a dumbness that was already outdated in stone age. When we are being told that it was only natural to be seeing retard phenomenons like felony, war and susperstitious fanatism around us at this time of intellect, then this is complete nonsense. Phenomenons channeled by trivial policies and their repercussions, and way under level of our potential culture. Same counts for other paradox like wilful destroyal of 50% of all food, favouring / installing of technologically inefficient standards and wilful bringing about of hardship and need to entertain capitalist marketing. - The mantra after manchester has been growth. As if growth was a holy grail. But growth is exclusively of sense for a pragmatically paradox outlay, serving an exploiting minority. Other than that growth is of no sense to menkind or the world. To the opposite. Growth, whether as a call for combine expansion (and its according ways of preparing turn-over ground) or as a call of clerics for an enlarging host of worshippers, only aims at imperial fancy in total neglect of reason and wholy regards. Its bait, the promise for either improved living standard / woking positions for the people, or a reservation in paradise, a contradictive hoax. Resulting truth from both: Monopolism, impoverishment and overpopulation. - So, what could be helpful to escape an ecological collapse; and what would be realistic? A question making my head explode. Countless points and about zero chances. Right. A most effective scene would be a rise of the people world-wide, taking over and taking measures right away. Gathering international scientists in congresses, first of their individual subjects (economy, ecology, technology medicine, you name it) then in open ones to tackle priorities, methods, logistics and organisation. What a dream ... Yes, yes, hardly imaginable how to get all that input categorized and into flow, and it would take some precious amount of time, even if they all worked at their limits, but once a rough table was there and action started ... Mind-blowing to think of the potency, with all available means in the hands of a wholy targeted intelligentia. And economically, the procedures, scrapped from the current, exessive parasite margins on each and every instance, allowing for operations so much more powerful than they ever could be now. Whereas public funds freed from those 60% of draining into mafia pockets, then in a position to powerfully contribute to the international eco-rescue whilst able to properly serve their citizens. Redistributing the world to people and to natural refuges. Putting technology and production into full efficiency for men, environment and future. What a dream. Right. Not going to happen. Not now and not without foregone information of international public. What would be realistic? In a world and its official institutions controlled through plutocratic systems, I only see the ants path available. You and me adequately alarmed and thus involuntarily spreading the urgency among our private surrounding. At home, work and spare time. Live and online. Where ever just possible. How chances are this way? That is not the question. It just seems the only choice of approach. If it could contribute to in the end hundreds of thousands of demanding people filling the streets of major cities ... If decidedly enough to make elites concerned about the preservation of their regime, major industries could be giving in into accepting investments into environmental measures. It is a shame to see such relevance dependent from widget efforts, but that is how it is. Reason, ideal, superiour concerns or general prospects are not represented in pharaonic reign. Only individual regards of trivial intellect. A total delirium of moguls in global milking machines. One more reason why we pedestrians need to be aware. Ruphus
|
|
|
|