Ruphus -> RE: What´s up with the lisp? (Oct. 5 2014 9:40:35)
|
A hypothetical question, Stephen: What was to be if I was right with those statements? I suspect that you would still be cherrishing aversion against me, for your symptomatic approach. ( Me introducing the devil.) While I do wish for harmony, to my understanding getting along can´t be priority over matter. The latter is primacy. ( And in general I find it really entertaining and educating when the matter is priority; even though not doubting that in my case better diplomatic skills could only be useful.) Further, with my limited diplomatic skills I wouldn´t even know how to incorporate certain takes into a consensus and ignore eventual disproportion / injust. You can only make arrangements in respect of things / moves that won´t trigger another mischief. However, many aspects will produce mischief somewhere else when arranged as variable. It is only that in our mainstream methodology deconstructivism is hardly known, lest even applied. Which again is not a coincidence. Neglect of deconstructivism ( a main factor of ethics, besides) after all is one of the major intellectual means to organize a pretended democracy sans realization of it actually being a dictature. You want an example of completely amputated deconstructivistic skills? You are watching in the billions how a few thousand people are amassing endless values as private property and on their path and tactics of destruction are derpiving men and creature of innate rights and supply. Lately even so ruinously exploiting life and planet that we are facing the greatest species extinction ever. In the meantime the supposed thinking individuals among you are noting that social forms of societal organization had proven to fail. That is all. It is like living in the late 19th century and stating that combustion engine had proven as misconception, for noone been able to bring that tech to serial production. Let aside to seriously consider an alternative to steam engines at all. As if new ways to modern production and mobility weren´t in demand anyway. We don´t need contemplation, no basic acknowledgement of sobriety and proportinality and no suspicion against private chambers that are labelled "democracy". Just keep moving on. For, we could try out those crap opinions later on in Nirvana. How self-focussed and conceited am I to see blatant phenomenons of faint, and where the hell are you wise, moderate, tolerant, politically correct hosts living? What planet are you experiencing? Ruphus
|
|
|
|