RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=264952



Message


Leñador -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 7 2014 20:23:51)

Despite my smart-ass video clip I actually don't thinks it's "too jazzy". If anything it's a little too "classically" for me. It's fine, I'd be stoked to see it live but it'd probly only last a week or so on my iPod for being a little too "elegant" for my taste. It's good music indeed though.




Richard Jernigan -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 7 2014 20:51:35)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo
using the (rather derogatory) adjective to describe music that is not in anyway at all "jazz" related.
Ricardo


Ricardo I think I can understand a little of how you feel about the implied putdowns. When I was a kid I played in the Washington Summer Symphony, an award winning high school concert band, in a jazz group, a mambo band and my own fairly eclectic band, that played for dances as well as for just listening.

Each group contained people who put down most of the others. Jazz friends would ask, "Why do you sit around all evening and just read notes off the page?" Symphony friends would ask, "Why do you hang around with those guys that play out of tune all the time?" Mambo friends would ask, "Where's the clave, man? That stuff just doesn't move…"

Some of the best Balinese musicians I have known have expressed puzzlement at European classical music--and Balinese gamelan is some of the most complex and sophisticated music on the planet.

Ever since I took up the guitar I have played some classical and some traditional flamenco. We all know how that has been, for the last 75 years at least.

I love it all. So "reminding me of jazz" is no putdown coming from me.

But isn't it going just a bit far to say the modern style of flamenco guitar solo isn't at all jazz related? Didn't Paco himself say that playing with McLaughlin and DiMeola really challenged him to learn more and to open up his harmonies? To me, this is a relation to jazz, even if Paco's music is not actually jazz.

This may sound like just a quibble, but as a kid I was bemused by the claims that musics that clearly influenced one another were actually totally separate and unrelated.

RNJ




Miguel de Maria -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 7 2014 22:19:44)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

Who? Nobody I remember expressed such a thing on here except for Doitsujin and he was half joking to get a rise out of folks anyway. The opposite seems to occur quite frequently to the point of MANY not able to admit even "flamenco" is going on.



I assume it from real world conversations and the types of things that people play and/or talk about. I do hear old farts talking about how post-Paco flamenco doesn't work for them quite a bit. My guess is that the better the musician, the more he's likely to like old _and_ new stuff, but it's the great mass of unwashed intermediate players who get all rigid and all.




jg7238 -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 7 2014 22:58:13)

quote:

Jg7238: ""Lo antiguo no es puro. Lo antiguo es antiguo. Puro es lo que haces con buen gusto y corazon. " "

I don't think here's a matter of old vs new or pure vs unpure.


That's true but by saying "jazzy bulerias" you are really implying that it is not pure flamenco. It is a bulerias with a modern spin plain and simple. Ricardo is dead on correct in his explanation. "Modern bulerias"I think is the more proper term but then again I'm just an aficionado... [:)]




rojarosguitar -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 7 2014 23:03:31)

Thanks for sharing this video. I liked it very much...




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 0:05:13)

quote:

Some of the best Balinese musicians I have known have expressed puzzlement at European classical music--and Balinese gamelan is some of the most complex and sophisticated music on the planet.


There are three main streams of gamelan music in Indonesia--Sundanese, Javanese, and Balinese--and all three are very complex and sophisticated. You no doubt are aware that the gamelan is native to Indonesia (primarily Java). It reached its apex on Java during the Majapahit Empire, a Hindu empire that lasted until Islam began taking over in the 14th century and gradually forced the Hindu Majapahits further and further east on Java, until the remains of the Empire ended up on Bali, where it continues today. Yet, interestingly, the three gamelan styles--Sundanese, Javanese, and Balinese--continue in their respective regions today.

Although the gamelan originated on Java, one of the most important components of the gamelan (in Sunda, Java, and Bali), the Sinden, (always a woman who sings beautifully and hauntingly). has been heavily influenced by Indian music. While I was living in Jakarta and assigned to the U.S. Embassy, I became good friends with an ethno-musicologist who was based in Bali and had lived there for many years. He had written many monographs on both the gamelan and, specifically, on the development of the gong, which is another Javanese innovation. I had a gong made in Bogor, a center of gong-manufacturing located an hour out of Jakarta, and I still keep it in our home, where it is an interesting artifact used to call guests to dinner.

Interestingly, Western music has not made much inroad into the gamelan, but the reverse is certainly true: The gamelan has influenced Western music. The following is extracted from "American Mavericks," in Association with the San Francisco Symphony.

"Canadian composer Colin McPhee was not the first Westerner to have his life changed by Asian music. The French composer Claude Debussy, too, had heard a Javanese gamelan at the 1889 Paris World Exhibition, and tried to imitate its harmonies. But McPhee went further - much further - to Bali itself. He had spent the 1920s in New York City, writing highly rhythmic music of repeating patterns under the spell of Igor Stravinsky. By the late 1920s, according to his biographer Carol Oja, he was at a compositional impasse, disillusioned with writing esoteric music for small audiences. "Quite by accident," as McPhee put it, he heard some recordings of Balinese music released in 1928 on the Odeon label. [Balinese gamelan recording fades in beneath the following] "The clear, metallic sounds," he later wrote, "were like the stirring of a thousand bells, delicate, confused, with a sensuous charm, a mystery that was quite overpowering.... I returned the records, but I could not forget them. I knew little about the music of the East. I still believed that an artist must keep his mind on his own immediate world. But... after I had read... the quite fabulous accounts of these ancient and ceremonial orchestras, my imagination took fire, and... I determined to make a trip to the East to see them for myself."

McPhee and his wife, the anthropologist Jane Belo, visited Bali for six months in 1931, and returned the follow year for a longer visit. They found a spot high in the hills near the little village of Sayan, perched on a mountain ridge, and built a house in Balinese style, made of bamboo and a thatched roof. There were no stores around, just an open market every other day, nor was there plumbing or electricity. McPhee interviewed Balinese musicians and eventually borrowed gamelan instruments and started his own gamelan - an orchestra of metallophones and gongs. The experience changed him forever. Returning to Paris when his visa expired, he "found himself 'restless' at concerts and claimed that 'the programs of new music that I once delighted in now seemed suddenly dull and intellectual.' He longed for the magic of the 'sunny music" of Bali."

In 1936 McPhee wrote what would become and remain his most famous composition, Tabuh-Tabuhan. Half composition, half transcription, this was the first attempt to reproduce the patterns of Balinese music using a conventional European orchestra. From the very opening, it uses a simple four-note row in different permutations and at different rhythmic levels at once, just like much Balinese music. The second movement begins with a flute melody that is McPhee's own, but written in an exotic scale and sounding like a Balinese suling flute. The third movement is closest of all to Balinese music, basically an orchestral transcription of one of the Odeon recordings McPhee had found. However, even in this he was following Balinese practice, because composers of traditional Balinese music start with traditional melodic formulas and place them in new combinations. As McPhee himself wrote, "In Bali music is not composed but rearranged."

Bill




Paul Magnussen -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 0:25:08)

So you like gamelan music: excellent. You have something in common with Sir David Attenborough.

Can you recommend any particular recordings?

Also, do you happen to know of any books or articles on its theory and/or structure that might be intelligible to a Westerner?




estebanana -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 1:22:55)

Listen to Lou Harrison, the America composer who lived in Santa Cruz. He mixed Gamelan and Western music together. He also wrote about it.






And old favorite of mine-




estebanana -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 1:48:48)

Lou Harrison is a great composer and his music is a good entry point for studies between western and eastern musics. He wrote about it and lots of other writers wrote about him.

He was also influenced by John Cages use of changing the the way piano action works by sticking things into it. They were both thinking about gamelan structure when they did that, because at that point in the 1940's they felt western music had not progressed much rhythmically. Cages "Interludes for Prepared Piano" are about gamelan sensibilities for rhythm, percussion and more extension of the tessatura of the piano. He basically ingeniously stuck things into and between the piano strings changing the notes to make it sound like a tiny gamelan orchestra.




Here's a piece for guitar inspired by gamalan structures:





estebanana -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 1:53:17)

...or just run into it headlong in to it and listen first and ask questions later.

Several hundred Gamelan music videos:

http://www.google.com/search?q=gamelan&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&hl=en&prmd=ivnspb&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ei=agsNVNifNImOuASB6IHYDw&ved=0CAYQ_AU




estebanana -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 1:57:01)

Here is one of the Interludes for prepared piano that is quite jazzy and gamelany:





Ruphus -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 8:06:11)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Jernigan


But isn't it going just a bit far to say the modern style of flamenco guitar solo isn't at all jazz related? Didn't Paco himself say that playing with McLaughlin and DiMeola really challenged him to learn more and to open up his harmonies? To me, this is a relation to jazz, even if Paco's music is not actually jazz.


Like Paco´s use of sliding out, which might have been funny in a way for once. But not that suting as an effect for to hear it all over flamenco guitar, like it has become. ( Also contained in the initial video above. - Naturally.)

Though used in flamenco since decades now, to my ears this technique will just not diffuse into the music. Rather could bending ( which in fact I have incorporated into f-style playing sometimes) than sliding out.

If rejecting this kind of sound in this genre makes me appear biased or inflexible, so be it. For what I can tell, it is mere musical perception that finds this kind of sound not matching though.

I think to be open to innovations as long as they add musically. For instance had I not heard yet of mouth organ replacing cante until a while ago, but came to think beforehand that it could be musically interesting if well made.

Ruphus




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 16:22:22)

quote:

Can you recommend any particular recordings? Also, do you happen to know of any books or articles on its theory and/or structure that might be intelligible to a Westerner?


Paul,

A very good source for information about the gamelan is the American Gamelan Institute's website. They have an online library; a catalog of scores, notation, and monographs; a store where one can purchase books and CDs; and one can subscribe to their Journal "Balungan," which is in English. The material they offer (including CDs) covers Javanese gamelan (particularly that of Jogjakarta, the Central Javanese court which still has a Sultan), as well as Sundanese (West Java), and Balinese gamelan.

Cheers,

Bill




Richard Jernigan -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 18:58:43)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BarkellWH

There are three main streams of gamelan music in Indonesia--Sundanese, Javanese, and Balinese--and all three are very complex and sophisticated. You no doubt are aware that the gamelan is native to Indonesia (primarily Java). It reached its apex on Java during the Majapahit Empire, a Hindu empire that lasted until Islam began taking over in the 14th century and gradually forced the Hindu Majapahits further and further east on Java, until the remains of the Empire ended up on Bali, where it continues today. Yet, interestingly, the three gamelan styles--Sundanese, Javanese, and Balinese--continue in their respective regions today.

As McPhee himself wrote, "In Bali music is not composed but rearranged."

Bill


The borderline between composition and rearrangement is a bit fuzzy. After talking with the guru of the Bangli gamelan about the development of the 10-minute piece he was teaching the orchestra, I would say that particular process was well on the composition side of the line.

But the newer gong kebyar style has come to the fore in Bali since McPhee's day.

Despite my surprisingly advanced age, I have no experience of Javanese gamelan at its apex in the 14th century. But on Java I have heard the ancient gamelan at the Sultan's palace in Solo, the accompaniment to wayang orang in the same city, one of the gamelans at the Sultan's palace in Yogyakarta, accompaniment to wayang kulit at the Yogyakarta palace, accompaniment to the Sea Goddess dances at Parang Tritis, and the accompaniment to the Ramayana dance performance at the large performance center near the highway intersection where the road goes up to Tretes in East Java.

It is a matter of personal taste, of course, but I find contemporary Balinese gamelan more interesting. It is certainly more lively and complex. One of the intriguing features of Indonesian classical dance is the rapid succession of gestures, or what might be called or "poses". These are specific configurations of all parts of the body, including the eyes, which are taught and practiced from childhood, when a dancer's training begins.

An example from a famous Balinese dancer:



Sorry you can't see her legs and bare feet. They are important components. The feet are particularly expressive.

The poses sometimes follow one another in rapid succession, as quickly as 240 beats/minute, telling a story. It makes for an interesting challenge in action photography. The music is tightly integrated with the dance, each gesture gets at least one beat, often several. Sequences of gestures often get extended musical phrases.

A fairly serious tourist performance can last an hour and a half. A performance for a Balinese audience can go on almost all night.

Dance performances of the classic stories vary considerably from one troupe to another, and evolve over time from a given troupe, though the stories are recognizable even to a foreigner like me. The music must be re-fashioned to fit the dance performances.

Besides dance accompaniment, gamelan in Bali enjoys a lively concert scene. Every town and village of any size has its gamelan, composed of amateurs, except for the guru, whose salary is paid from members' dues. Every year there is a big gamelan contest in Denpasar, with dozens of orchestras presenting their new compositions.

RNJ

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 19:37:14)

I never tire of watching the great Hindu epic "The Ramayana" performed, particularly in Java, accompanied by a Javanese gamelan. What I really love to listen to, however, is a gamelan performance with a Sinden singing. Often one hears gamelan performed with just the instruments and no Sinden, which is always nice, but a gamelan accompanying a Sinden is exquisite.

Bill




Richard Jernigan -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 19:46:10)

My educated Javanese friends consider their art forms to be more halus (refined) than the earthier Balinese ones. I nod in feigned agreement and keep quiet, or speak to them only in ambiguities.

RNJ




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 20:02:31)

quote:

A fairly serious tourist performance can last an hour and a half. A performance for a Balinese audience can go on almost all night.


The same holds true for a wayang kulit performance. In the old days, it was common for wayang kulit performances to last all night. Today, however, even for (non-tourist) Indonesian audiences (be they Javanese, Sundanese, Balinese or other groups), it is rare to see an all-night wayang kulit performance. I think a large part of the reason is that in the old days wayang kulit was the only entertainment game in town, while today there are clubs, movies, rock concerts and a half-dozen other activities people can attend for entertainment. Sadly, many Indonesians today find wayang kulit far less exciting and interesting than a night out on the town, or in the case of the professional class, visiting friends or going to their town clubs (like professionals the world over).

Bill




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 20:31:32)

quote:

But on Java I have heard the ancient gamelan at the Sultan's palace in Solo


If I may be permitted one small correction. The hereditary ruler of the main court of Solo (Surakarta) is known as a "Sunan," (not Sultan) and holds no official status outside the walls of the kraton (palace). The current Sunan is Pakubuono XIII.

The hereditary ruler of the main court of Jogjakarta is a Sultan, the incumbent being Hamengkubuono X.

Bill




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 8 2014 20:53:12)

quote:

My educated Javanese friends consider their art forms to be more halus (refined) than the earthier Balinese ones. I nod in feigned agreement and keep quiet, or speak to them only in ambiguities.


Your educated Javanese friends are correct. I'm not suggesting that Javanese art forms are better, but they are more refined. As an example, Javanese music is more refined and controlled, almost intellectual. Balinese music, by contrast, is far more dynamic and lively.

The same holds true in dance. Javanese dance is more deliberately refined and controlled, while Balinese dance is more lively, very angular, and expressive.

Colin McPhee, one of the great interpreters of Javanese and Balinese culture for Western audiences summed it up nicely.

"Javanese gamelans have an incredibly soft, legato, velvet sound; the hammers and mallets that are used to strike the metallophones and gongs are padded so thickly as to eliminate all shock. Tempos are slow and stately, and there is little change in dynamics; the prevailing mood is one of untroubled calm and mystic serenity. Balinese music, on the other hand, is vigorous, rhythmic, explosive in quality; the gamelans sound bright and percussive; hard hammers of wood or horn are used for many instruments, and the thin clash of cymbals underlies every tone; only the great gongs are gently struck. While the classic calm of Javanese music and dance is never disturbed, music and dance in Bali is turbulent and dramatic, filled with contrast and bold effects. Javanese musicians find the music of Bali barbaric. Balinese complain that the music of Java "sends them to sleep."

McPhee wrote that in 1949, and it is as true today as it was then.

Bill




estebanana -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 9 2014 2:19:37)

I regret I did not become a foreign service officer or rocket scientist, the former more so than the later. Not only would it have fine tuned my latent, if seldom seen, diplomatic skills, it would have afforded me the opportunity to travel to see gamelan in person and get a salary!




Richard Jernigan -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 9 2014 3:49:35)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BarkellWH

Your educated Javanese friends are correct. I'm not suggesting that Javanese art forms are better, but they are more refined. As an example, Javanese music is more refined and controlled, almost intellectual. Balinese music, by contrast, is far more dynamic and lively.

The same holds true in dance. Javanese dance is more deliberately refined and controlled, while Balinese dance is more lively, very angular, and expressive.

Colin McPhee, one of the great interpreters of Javanese and Balinese culture for Western audiences summed it up nicely.

"Javanese gamelans have an incredibly soft, legato, velvet sound; the hammers and mallets that are used to strike the metallophones and gongs are padded so thickly as to eliminate all shock. Tempos are slow and stately, and there is little change in dynamics; the prevailing mood is one of untroubled calm and mystic serenity. Balinese music, on the other hand, is vigorous, rhythmic, explosive in quality; the gamelans sound bright and percussive; hard hammers of wood or horn are used for many instruments, and the thin clash of cymbals underlies every tone; only the great gongs are gently struck. While the classic calm of Javanese music and dance is never disturbed, music and dance in Bali is turbulent and dramatic, filled with contrast and bold effects. Javanese musicians find the music of Bali barbaric. Balinese complain that the music of Java "sends them to sleep."

McPhee wrote that in 1949, and it is as true today as it was then.

Bill


Well said by McPhee. Perhaps what attracts me to the Balinese versions is the same impulse that leads me to pick up a flamenco guitar after a couple of days working on classical.

RNJ




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 9 2014 16:01:51)

quote:

Well said by McPhee. Perhaps what attracts me to the Balinese versions is the same impulse that leads me to pick up a flamenco guitar after a couple of days working on classical.


I am more schizophrenic than you. Although I enjoy both classical and flamenco guitar; like you, I am more drawn to flamenco than to classical.

When it comes to Javanese and Balinese gamelan and classical dance (both of which I enjoy), however, I prefer the more refined Javanese to Balinese.

Don't know if that apparent dissonance contains the seed for someone's doctoral dissertation, but if so, I would be a willing subject.

Bill




Ricardo -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 2:51:02)

not clear how that non rhythmic out of tune gong bong music took over the thread but, thanks for sharing. Yes I finally see the point how modern flamenco in all it's glory is nothing more than rehashed jazz menco crap. too many notes again. [:D]




runner -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 4:03:28)

It is always interesting to see people's various reactions to expressions of preference in art, music, etc. I firmly believe that one's reaction to a work of art is entirely subjective, and that a necessary corollary is that there is no such thing as good or bad in art--we either like it or we don't. This is not to say that there are no factors at work within the minds of individuals that control the degree of interest in or pleasure derived from any given work of art--Leonard Meyer, Oliver Sachs, others have written extensively on this, and neurology and brain imaging are constantly adding to our knowledge of the interacting of our brains ad sense organs with art.

But if (as I believe is demonstrably true) there is only what we like and dislike, then it is best to accept that others have opinions and views that differ from yours, to respect that and to let it go at that. J. Robert Oppenheimer, who all agree was a sensitive, highly educated, widely-read, talented, and enormously intelligent man, himself fell into profound error when he wrote to his brother Frank that the "best" art was what the most educated and cultured individuals in a society themselves most treasured. This is an indefensible proposition on its face, and I was startled to read that Oppenheimer believed such a thing. What one can say about a work of art, besides whether one likes it, and, ex post facto, why, is whether the work has been accurately labeled; whether Prokofiev's 2nd piano concerto is or is not Baroque.

Painting on velvet is not my own personal sort of art, though I believe that a depiction of Jesus and Elvis together in heaven might be well worth seeing, though some might call it kitsch. Yet could not a Mark Rothko be considered a form of kitsch for the rich? So when people say they don't like "jazzy bulerias", my feelings are not hurt, I don't feel put down or threatened; I know that I'm just not the intended audience for jazzy bulerias. Relax! It's All Good (isn't it?)




Arash -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 7:11:20)

Too jazzy, too modern and too many notes, otherwise nice attempt.
[:D]
Joking aside, this is only possible because the Gallardo guy has good understanding of flamenco compas. "flamenco and classical duet" only works if the classical guy has good understanding of rythm (which is not often the case).




Bliblablub -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 16:19:52)

quote:

ORIGINAL: runner
This is not to say that there are no factors at work within the minds of individuals that control the degree of interest in or pleasure derived from any given work of art


Proabably one of the most unnecessarily complicated sentences I have heard in a while.
I don't think there is anything that "controls" the pleasure, especially not "within" the mind itself, as that would be hella self-contradictory. I think people like stuff because they choose to do so. Some people can say exactly why they like this or that song, going deep into musical details, which require some musical knowledge, a reflective relationship to and understanding of music. Some people have good tastes, but lack the knowledge part. Most people don't even bother with music or developing tastes in that field. I find it very boring when people try to blur out the fact that people obviously have different levels of understanding music and therefore differently valuable tastes in music.




Miguel de Maria -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 16:48:32)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bliblablub


Proabably one of the most unnecessarily complicated sentences I have heard in a while.
I think people like stuff because they choose to do so.


He said what he wanted to say concisely, whether or not it flew over your head or that you disagree.

Your rebuttal is entirely indefensible. I like sugar because I want to, just think about it.




runner -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 17:40:31)

Bliblablub, I will offer one small example of how (what is in) our minds controls the pleasure we may derive from some particular piece of music: Leonard Meyer and others have shown that, as we hear music, we are constantly assessing and attempting to predict what the next note or sequence of notes will be, based on what we are now hearing and have already heard. The accuracy of our prediction results in a constantly shifting balance of satisfaction (prediction fulfilled) and surprise (prediction proven wrong). These outcomes can have also the reverse effects: disappointment that the prediction is so "predictable", and joy at the delightful surprise. Each individual's mind is different--some have a greater tolerance for novelty than others, who are comfortable with greater predictability. I recommend Meyers' classic book Music, the Arts, and Ideas, should you be interested in pursuing this subject--it's a great start.

As art, this post of mine is neither good nor bad. You will like or dislike it based on what is in your mind.




BarkellWH -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 18:10:04)

Bravo, Runner! Well put indeed.

Bill




guitarbuddha -> RE: Flamenco and Classical guitar duet (Sep. 10 2014 19:28:51)

Hi Runner et all. I liked your description of the propagation of the potentiality of a musical motif when evaluated by a human brain conditioned culturally.

Following on from the ideas so graciously and memorably presented by Oliver Sacks there is a discussion on the absorption of musical vocabulary by children in Daniel Levitin's 'This is Your Brain on Music'.

Whereas Levitin lacks warmth and poetry of Sacks prose he actually takes a fair stab at explaining empirically why western music is easier for a child to understand regardless of cultural background and he backs it up with some citations of research to measure babies response to varying material. Discussion also on why pulse is reassuring and whatnot.

And call me a fuddy duddy but I like the idea of some empirical ways to evaluate music. So often our tastes can be so shaped by trying to second guess the prejudices of those whom we would wish to be our peers that very little attention is given to direct experience.

Now after typing that goobledygook I note that the denial and orthodoxy so common to easthetic sensibilities is discussed here along with a comparison between Kitch and Art. The winningly singleminded and witty VS Ramachandran is always worth listening to and anyone with the time would probably enjoy all these lectures.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/lecture3.shtml



D.




Page: <<   <   1 [2] 3    >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET