Ruphus -> RE: The fool in me carried away by the Siren (Jul. 1 2014 21:19:42)
|
"Efficiency" means to gain max at minimum efforts. I started out with the etxreme opposite. Nothing but playing. Admittedly, yet accidentally, largely technically correct / ergonomically at first. Later on I handicapped myslef however by going a basically other route, trying to copy some celebrity, thinking his awkward posture was the way to go I find it interesting how you seem to not have noticed that one can drag basic misconception through a hole career. Possibly shoving a huge repertoire of music around and with it still technical misconceptions that will needlessly hamper, dramatically reducing the time / output ratio and seamlessness, and completely prevent certain individual skills. Information is a highly efficient fuel to fill ones imagination with, and latest insights on physiology and neurology allow for corresponding progress. If on the other hand detailed and accuarte knowledge was so useless, how have I then been able to produce lucky campers partially in only a few minutes. Like e.g. with a guitarist who was already 14 years or so gigging and who called me up days after I had made him aware about something on levering, which now suddenly allowed him a drastically improved posture and playing. ( Not all know-how can be realized that quickly, but the efficiency of well stuffed imagination is always extreme compared to more or less random approach and technically possible counter production.) When preconditions are perfect, like when you are inspired by seamless players, or yourself being one of the talents that will execute economically by chance, then you might be doing pretty well without the little help through analytics. But when there is no such perfect ideal in reach, knwoing why and how things happen is invaluable. For, in all cases, the quality of imagination / anticipation makes for the most relevant point. If projection about an execution is failed ( against physiology / ergonomics) you may execute a ttechnique in question for a million times and either progress very little, not at all, or even develop blockade, and in the opposite: If projection is perfect, progress is a blink / efficiency at max. Quoting myself for lazyness: quote:
Modern didactics should know that success is all about correct imagination before actual action. This insight also being behind todays mental training of for instance top athletes. Those are being trained to invision the action beforehand as detailed as possible. F1 pilots for instance drive through the course in mind, and such precisely at that that they reach the envisioned finish in mind, accurately down to milli seconds of the real thing. From there, I believe that in the future proficiency like learning an instrument should become considerably different and more efficiently from today. Aside of possible physical methods like eventual transfers of informative bearers, or mechanical tools etc., which shall remain unconsidered here, projectionist means of imagination will advance considerably, showing great effect on learners. This does not mean that you couldn´t have great didactics with max playing at min exercising, provided details / inspiration are perfect. I personally, due to repairing, however do need exercising. Other I cannot remove established ineffciencies / malfunctions. Unrolling from scratch / reprogramming can only be done by exercising. Ruphus
|
|
|
|