Ruphus -> RE: IT Question (Mar. 18 2014 21:01:37)
|
Thanks, Arash. In the second part of your reply resides potential to the answer. ( First part not so much, as it has to do with voluntary renunciation of profits.) So, how far would a devaluation through unspecific traffic go? Naturally, the more you can tell manufacturers about your visitors / the more transparent / specific the characteristics of vistors, the higher in value the option for corresponding industries´s placing of advertisements. What if the traffic is more or less unspecific, with everyone and their aunt Elisabeth clicking through the plattform? What if they stay only for a short while? Or erratically with very different ways of stopping in? What if visitors come only sporadically, however consistantly in large numbers? Can a large number of clicks remain worthless on the marketing sector? I have heard of such an opinion ( from laymen, though), but can´t agree. I am convinced that a large number of visitors is always capable of generating correspondingly large investments through advertising. If unspeciific ads wouldn´t pay, positioning like on advertising pillars would be useless. After all, instead of orphaned surfaces we see rather more than less unspecific ads. Large screens over public spots seem the deal these days. From there I assume: # The less specific the public the lower advertising fees may be # yet, any traffic / viewings count Thus: Large traffic with unspecific vistors and behaviour might yield small pennies per visiting / viewing head yet considerable profits. Objections anyone? Ruphus
|
|
|
|