RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - Lutherie: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=22
- - - RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature?: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=240619



Message


rogeliocan -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 6 2013 10:18:05)

That is just a picture, not the actual label.




mark indigo -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 6 2013 11:07:26)

quote:

the dream I had while I was dating the Jungian analyst a few years ago:

....I realized I was Carl Jung and the picnic table meant it was my office. The orange liquid we put on the violins was the blood of Christ and was formulated from a dream recipe taken out of the gnostic gospels that Jung had been interpreting.

My conclusion was that I should go forth and seek the holy grail, which we all know is a wooden vessel called A Conde'.


[:D][:D][:D][:D]




rogeliocan -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 6 2013 12:32:04)

quote:

My conclusion was that I should go forth and seek the holy grail, which we all
know is a wooden vessel called A Conde'.


God that made me laugh, what a conclusion. Good one.




z6 -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 6 2013 15:34:02)

Build it. And they will come.




gbv1158 -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 7 2013 13:26:54)

quote:



quote:

On the home page the sections under the "Discussion" heading could be,

Lutherie Building and repair.

Guitarra Flamenca Anything else related to the instrument; history, valuation, market etc..

I'm sure there will still be errant posts, though I think it can be interesting when things go off on a tangent. I would like it if this was still allowed to happen. Maybe set a frame work but not get too rigid?



This sounds reasonable to me, it would allow for the building and repair discussion to be more liberated from non intrinsic crosstalk. Of course if someone makes an comment about history of guitars or the origins of nomenclature of guitar parts or tools or other more esoteric things in context with a building project that is cool. I just want to see the building talk stay focused so we can keep an intensity in guitar making.

I've got projects I want to share and I can learn a lot more here..and teach a few things. I'd like to see the building get more serious. I'm a funny irreverent person when I want to be and I think flamenco attracts that kind of person, but I don't always want to be the joker you read on your iPad while on the train. There's a place for fun & games and a place to be focused and studious, they can intersect, but lets keep it clear.



I agree, Stephen;


I imagine this section as a place where "speak" the builders, while the others listen, ask questions and learn ONLY.

If the builder is a serious person who well knows that there IS NOT a point of arrival in any trade where one can say " I KNOW" , HE COMPARES his work, his “way to built” , with other builders.

In this way the WISDOM and EXPERIENCE of each builder itself DRIVES the discussion on the subject still keeping in : his own character and spirit of exploration, creativity and artistry, as well as his personality.

So I imagine a LUTHIER section to better understand/learn about the guitar construction process, materials and tools, the right way to use each of them, the shape of each single part and the way they have to be assembled, the general form of the guitar, the form of details, the relation between all of this and the sound.
There may also be studied, as a valid example, one special model of guitar, but it has to be finalized to understand how to built not the “same guitar” but “the best guitar”.

I hope I wrote something that makes sense…because the luthier section (when not dedicated only to self promotion or to explore “Conde world” :- ) ) is VERY interesting……
.............and let me add : I hope Anders comes back to the forum and in this section. :-)

Ciao
giambattista




mark indigo -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 7 2013 16:34:15)

quote:

.....a serious person who well knows that there IS NOT a point of arrival in any trade where one can say " I KNOW" , HE COMPARES his work, his “way to..” , with other(s)

In this way the WISDOM and EXPERIENCE of each .... DRIVES the discussion on the subject still keeping in : his own character and spirit of exploration, creativity and artistry, as well as his personality.

So I imagine a ..... section to better understand/learn about the .... process, materials and tools, the right way to use each of them, the shape of each .... part and the way they have to be assembled, the general form ...., the form of details, the relation[ships] between all of this ....

There may also be studied, as a valid example, one special model ...., but it has to be [understood] how to [become] not the “same...” but “the best...”.


I hope you will forgive me if I have hacked at your post a bit. Where I have added or modified letters or words to keep the grammar or sense I have put those in [ ], and where I have removed words (usually the specific "guitar") I have replaced with ......

Your post now expresses what I would hope for every section of the foro, for any area of study and/or discussion, and for many areas of life. Nice post[:)]




mark indigo -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 7 2013 16:35:33)

what happened to my post? where did all those weird lines come from?




Escribano -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 11 2013 13:38:46)

There was a combination of letters that were interpreted as a strike-through. I fixed it.




mark indigo -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 11 2013 13:42:03)

Thanks[:)]




Ricardo -> RE: Fastino Conde 1986 without signature? (Sep. 11 2013 17:02:27)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo

quote:

.....a serious person who well knows that there IS NOT a point of arrival in any trade where one can say " I KNOW" , HE COMPARES his work, his “way to..” , with other(s)

In this way the WISDOM and EXPERIENCE of each .... DRIVES the discussion on the subject still keeping in : his own character and spirit of exploration, creativity and artistry, as well as his personality.

So I imagine a ..... section to better understand/learn about the .... process, materials and tools, the right way to use each of them, the shape of each .... part and the way they have to be assembled, the general form ...., the form of details, the relation[ships] between all of this ....

There may also be studied, as a valid example, one special model ...., but it has to be [understood] how to [become] not the “same...” but “the best...”.


I hope you will forgive me if I have hacked at your post a bit. Where I have added or modified letters or words to keep the grammar or sense I have put those in [ ], and where I have removed words (usually the specific "guitar") I have replaced with ......

Your post now expresses what I would hope for every section of the foro, for any area of study and/or discussion, and for many areas of life. Nice post[:)]


Sure, it would be great...so long as the Conde fear stops!! [:D]




Page: <<   <   1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET