RE: No magic bullets.

RE: No magic bullets. (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - RE: No magic bullets.: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=232796

Message

guitarbuddha -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 26 2013 22:35:15)
quote: ORIGINAL: bursche I thought I recognised you from your videos but now it is certain,,,,,,,,,,,senor Zorro. D. Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

hamia -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 27 2013 1:04:50)
quote: ORIGINAL: bursche This straight line topic is fascinating! Look how transforming the start and finish into lines creates endless possibilities of how to find the efficient solution. All of them which are straight lines. I have also indicated an inefficient solution. Still a straight line, but longer. You're not necessarily correct that a longer line is less efficient. Eg, in the case of a wave propagating between 2 points in a layered medium (with the layers having different velocities) it's not true that the straight line is the quickest. The rays will travel so as to minimize time not distance.

guitarbuddha -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 27 2013 8:46:54)
More advice in straight line travel. In this case an inter-room scenario is indicated but other situations will surely apply. D.

Ruphus -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 27 2013 9:16:03)
Can´t see the videos, but sure enjoy mused detail like in this thread. Like with Hamia´s pointer to layered medium and the benefit of hitting angles closer to rectangular. [:D] Ruphus

bursche -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 27 2013 17:36:10)
It's a matter of choice. You have to make a decision about how you want to model your flamenco learning experience. In economics, modelling a market with linear supply and demand functions is far from how supply and demand really behave, but it's a great way to get a basic idea of how things will probably turn out in the long run. A layered medium seems to be an advanced approach compared to the parrallel lines and might be more accurate, but will it be suitable as a workhorse model?

Ricardo -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 28 2013 13:51:15)
Wow guys...ok, a diagonal line is straight, but you imply two different end points or "goals" which as I said before, makes no sense to me why someone would have a different goal regarding flamenco. THe sphere example IS 2d speaking of the surface, where the straight line I refer to between two points, again, exists on the INSIDE of the sphere (clearly) in 3d. Perfect example how "skimming the surface" might get you there, but it's not the direct and more efficient path.

guitarbuddha -> RE: No magic bullets. (May 28 2013 14:01:26)
quote: ORIGINAL: Ricardo Wow guys...ok, a diagonal line is straight, but you imply two different end points or "goals" which as I said before, makes no sense to me why someone would have a different goal regarding flamenco. THe sphere example IS 2d speaking of the surface, where the straight line I refer to between two points, again, exists on the INSIDE of the sphere (clearly) in 3d. Perfect example how "skimming the surface" might get you there, but it's not the direct and more efficient path. Gee thanks. Well worth the wait. D.

Page: << < 1 [2]

Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET