estebanana -> RE: Being an artist. (Apr. 5 2013 21:50:49)
|
quote:
I don't understand the Rothko stuff, what exactly should we be admiring? (not being a smart ass, would really like to be edumacated) That's why I backed two Bonnard paintings before two Rothkos. Bonnards color and light describes a wall, a sky, a blind, Rothko's is your guess. It just exists as color and light. Rothkos light and color are disembodied from a form you recognize, and it changes as you look. When you see a good Rothko it's like looking at a sunset. It's like a sunset has no solid form, these pictures are lighting each persons interior light. But then again not everyone cares for Rothko, some times I feel them as really heavy.
|
|
|
|