tiro 650mm o 660mm

tiro 650mm o 660mm (Full Version)

Foro Flamenco: http://www.foroflamenco.com/
- Discussions: http://www.foroflamenco.com/default.asp?catApp=0
- - General: http://www.foroflamenco.com/in_forum.asp?forumid=13
- - - tiro 650mm o 660mm: http://www.foroflamenco.com/fb.asp?m=226570

Message

profundo -> tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 11:32:56)
.

ralexander -> RE: tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 13:44:24)
Welcome to the Foro - there is a current discussion on this topic in the Lutherie section called "scale length & response" - it has also been discussed much in the past, just try a search.

Ricardo -> RE: tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 16:54:08)
10 mm, actually is meaningless IMO. especially for flamenco because if you use a capo on any fret it doesn't matter. I guess if you capo up very high (7 or above) the frets on a 670 will be noticeably more comfy, but it's still a minor point of playability. A thousand times more important is the action and bridge height over the soundboard. ricardo

bursche -> RE: tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 17:17:20)
don't forget 670mm. 670mm on Condes are really unnecessary.

Ricardo -> RE: tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 18:38:43)
quote: ORIGINAL: bursche don't forget 670mm 670mm on Condes are really unnecessary. Exactly, I was shocked to learn that's how big my guitar was, cuz it feels small actually.

rombsix -> RE: tiro 650mm o 660mm (Mar. 12 2013 23:30:01)
quote: Exactly, I was shocked to learn that's how big my guitar was, cuz it feels small actually. Kbeeeeeeeeer!

Page: [1]

Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET