Ron.M -> RE: Croydon's not ALL bad (Jul. 31 2010 10:26:59)
|
val, Can you or other Londoners fill me in on this... Areas of London seem to have changed a lot over the past 40 years or so. Is Croydon considered to be a "rough" area now or what? I used to work for a company with their head office in Croydon (the building that looked like a giant pile of thrupenny bits [:D]) and it seemed OK to me...wheras I've stayed in some Hotels in Cromwell Road and the area seemed pretty much like "bedsitter land" and a bit creepy...yet this is West London. Earl's Court was the same. Islington is now thought of as pretty swish, but I seem to remember it being on the "cheapo" end of the Monopoly board.[:D] Confusing. Why do some London Taxi drivers say "I'm not going South of the river at this time of night.."? Is it because it's considered "bad"..or just because it's too far to drive and there is more business by keeping central? BTW...Out of interest, how is Fulham rated these days? cheers, Ron
|
|
|
|