Miguel de Maria -> RE: The Very Worst of the Mundo y Formas de Flamenco? (Nov. 23 2004 16:45:53)
|
I think solo guitar is fun to play, but not fun to listen to. I don't get bored at my gigs...well, very rarely. In a way, it's performing, and in a way, it's practicing and experimenting with details of your stuff. Like...I have hard time working on expressiveness and dynamics at home, but at my gigs I do that stuff and it's fun. It's different every time. But solo guitar, or solo piano...or solo harp for that mattery is just not a very lively thing. It's very hard to energize a room with just one guitar. In fact, it's too much work. If you've ever gone into a room where there is just one guitarist or a pianist, you will notice that it's a very relaxing, (or could be thought of as boring) atmosphere. But if it's a pianoist and a singer, or two guitarists, or a guitar and a percussionist, then you have a different kind of feeling, a lot more energy and vibe. That's all I was saying. That's one reason I've been working on my singing... maybe I'll start singing for my cocktail hour type of thing, and then shifting to just guitar for dinner crowd. As far as dynamic, Jon, try sitting in a crowded, loud room with just your guitar and keep an appropriate energy and dynamism for an hour or two. It's a bit of a feat, really. I know I keep mentioning energy and that might seem funny or seem like I'm burnt out. But the fire in flamenco is mostly in its group context. One guitarist can only do so much. I didn't mean by my comment that the flamenco guitar does not have a good range of volumes, sounds, and moods. It's just too thin for some situations (but still better than classical!)
|
|
|
|