Ricardo -> RE: Madrid vs Granada (Mar. 29 2013 6:06:42)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HolyEvil quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricardo but if you played a different instrument, say flute in school, even back in say 1995, those things were already 10K for an average one. A $4000 Conde was a decent price for a fantastic guitar back then when I first got one. Lets not even get My friend plays the flute and back in 2002 he bought one which he say is medium to good and it cost him AU15000. And he said it's far from top of the range. I just look at him thinking whether I should kidnap him. But talking about testing the different condes.. It's easy for a good player like yourself to test it.. how do beginners/intermediate people test it? SO hard.. so I think smaller builders would be a better bet, smaller builders would strive to give out better guitars to increase their reputation etc. alright alright, I'll be painful honest cuz i had a couple vinos. When folks say an expensive top name guitar is mediocre or bad, we guys who play just kind of scratch our heads wtf, fool can't play so doesn't know how good it is. cuz a good player can make a cheap chinese guitar sound nice great, but would we buy it? well if that's all we can afford sure, and in the end it don't matter. we pay the extra thousands for those details we know are so much nicer. If the 50k guitar was so much better, yes we simply have to find a way, get a loan to get the thing. But fortunately that is not the case. So i repeat , there is hype because ONE GUYS LEMON IS ANOTHER GUYS GOLD when it comes to guitars. So don't worry that you can't play good. If the guitar has a good rep and you like it, it is good.
|
|
|
|