XXX -> RE: Shoud we have a public poll on the next challenge? (Jun. 4 2009 11:22:23)
|
Anyone can post a comment now too (and its already been done, lol). What about this: Why not mix the votings 50% public, 50% challengers. Challengers can vote each others by sending an email to an account, who collects all votes so that challengers dont see each others rankings. This way you also exclude challengers voting themselves. Remember, the more judges, and the more anonym they are, the more you have the risk of cheating, giving more points to your buddies here etc. In the intermediate it wasnt that obvious, but with this challenge we have to face the fact, that judgments can vary too much. Honestly, giving challengers also a voice will remove alot of frustration. It will be much more rewarding, because somebody who plays the piece is endlessly more suited to give a good opinion. To involve the public, we can mix the scores. I mean, its sad enough that the majority of the "normal" people is not into flamenco. Should we adapt that system? Oh, and it would surprise me alot if this poll here would have a majority for "NO" [;)] Its like asking: "Hey should there be free beer for everyone?" [:D]
|
|
|
|