Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: What about a Sevilliana?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
Ricardo
Posts: 14818
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
|
RE: What about a Sevilliana? (in reply to zata)
|
|
|
quote:
No need to refer to pre 1900, the fandango era begins and ends squarely within modern times, while many forms of the fandango family go much further back and are even mentioned in written accounts. And then there's Padre Soler's "fandango" from the 1700's. That makes no sense, unless you meant "fandangos naturales", which is fine. To not go on and on about it, I will just stick with this statement and leave it at that: quote:
The first fandangos are believed to have been abandolao forms derived from Moorish music, Only point I was making all along, first there was compas, then there was free style. The free style fandangos evolved from the song form that had a beat at first. quote:
If you read the original Spanish letter, no one called Manuel Martín an "idiot". yeah I know I was just poking some fun. The real words were "racist/faciast" I believe. Since you seem to be defending him I will REALLY leave this one alone, or this could get ugly quite quick! quote:
we don't have many threads about cante and I wish we did. Great, as long as we talk about what we LIKE and not who we think "does not know how to sing flamenco...". Any singer knows that Estrella can SING or whoever else gets bad critic. Whether or not you like it is something else. Critics of singing should just sing then, and show everyone how it is done. Same for guitar and dance. That being said, some aficionados sing BETTER than some pros at certain styles. I think it is good that a singer focus on something rather than sing everything just to show knowleadge. But that is just my opinion as a fan. quote:
This is a guitar forum. If there are half a dozen people here who understand cante sufficiently to understand what Martin Martin is saying, it would surprise me. Not goin there...
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Dec. 27 2007 3:53:50
|
|
Ricardo
Posts: 14818
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC
|
RE: What about a Sevilliana? (in reply to Kate)
|
|
|
quote:
Ah yes and if you are going to be an orchestra/classical music critic you have to play every single instrument in the world I would not be a good critic for orchestral music. I can say I like it or not. A paid critic should IMO have experience conducting, and playing some of the instruments that are used in orchestra. For example, violin or viola or cello, or a wind instrument like flute or clarinete or oboe, or Percussion. I don't mean a drummer for a rock band, but someone with experience playing auxiliary percussion for concert bands or symphonies. Someone who only plays piano, guitar, or just sings, or just LISTENS to music, would not make a good critic of orchestral music IMO. And I don't mean they took some classes in college, but actually have experience. OK that is just my opinion. Likewise a guitarist with experience accomp. pro flamenco singers would make a better critic of singing than say a flamencologist that writes books, but can barely do palmas. Hope you know what I mean.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Dec. 29 2007 3:27:58
|
|
Kate
Posts: 1827
Joined: Jul. 8 2003
From: Living in Granada, Andalucía
|
RE: What about a Sevilliana? (in reply to Ricardo)
|
|
|
Hi Ricardo, A critic is essentially a journalist, and one does not expect a war correspondant to also be a soldier. Theatre critics are very rarely actors, and would you trust an actor to review a film. If flamencos were left to review themselves everything they would all be falling over themselves with praise and would keep the bitching for backstage. I do see what you are saying but just because some-one plays guitar does not mean that they can write ( I know quite a few flamencos that cant). I did not read the original review that sparked the protest letter so cant comment on what Morente said or why he said it, but many feel it was a bit undignified. Its a shame that Martín's regular flamenco review for El Mundo is not published online so we can all see his apparantly very tough style of reviewing. We also dont know that he cant sing, dance or play guitar. I bet he does a bit. As Sean and Estela have said Martín is very respected, he has been called 'el mejor crítico de flamenco de España', “el crítico más experto de este tiempo” and Felix Grande said of his writing "un nuevo estilo ha nacido en el periodismo". He recieved numerous awards for his contribution to flamenco la Mención Especial del Premio de Periodismo Ricardo Molina, de Córdoba (1986), el I Premio Nacional de Periodismo ‘Antonio Mairena’ (1987), Premio Nacional de Periodismo ‘Ciudad de La Unión’ (1987), Premio a la Mayor Cobertura de Espectáculos Flamencos (1999), Premio Nacional de Flamencología en su modalidad de ‘Crítica Periodística’ (1999), único concedido hasta el momento en la historia del flamenco, Premio Nacional de Ensayo Flamenco Niño Medina (2001) Premio de Investigación y Crítica de la Bienal Málaga en Flamenco 2006. With all that I'd give him the benefit of the doubt that he knows what he is talking about. Kate
_____________________________
Emilio Maya Temple http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000CA6OBC http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/emiliomaya
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Dec. 29 2007 4:16:28
|
|
andresito
Posts: 377
Joined: Feb. 20 2007
From: New Holland
|
RE: What about a Sevilliana? (in reply to Kate)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kate He recieved numerous awards for his contribution to flamenco All the awards are for journalism/writing, so one could say that his contribution has been to journalism or criticism as much as to flamenco. Original:Kate - We also dont know that he cant sing, dance or play guitar. I bet he does a bit.] Which would make him an aficionado of flamenco and an expert in journalism, wouldn't you agree? P.S. When I quoted Ricardo the context was about Martin, not Estela [Original:Kate - Actually Zata can sing, dance as well as play guitar so I guess she qualifies. ] Sorry, I'm not trying cause fights here, just expressing my opinion But if people can say "Those who can, do; Those who can't, teach" then I would also say "Those who can't teach, criticise"
_____________________________
¡este arbol tiene duende, cabron!
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Dec. 29 2007 10:17:44
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|