RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950

Costs are rising and times are tough.
Please consider a donation to keep this
place going.

Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.

You are logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >>

Page: << < 1 [2]

Message

<< Newer Topic Older Topic >>

Ricardo

Posts: 14801
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to El Burdo)

[/quote]

Really well done!

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 1 2020 22:20:40

RobF

Posts: 1611
Joined: Aug. 24 2017

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to El Burdo)

quote:

Ouch. I had a go at that

I don’t see how you had much choice but to restore it to pegs, that was a disaster waiting to happen. Hardly any wood left!

Agree with Ricardo. Good job.

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 1 2020 23:23:08

Ricardo

Posts: 14801
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to Ricardo)

Look at this sloppy work of Faustino (or was it a conversion by someone?)

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 2 2020 19:14:34

RobF

Posts: 1611
Joined: Aug. 24 2017

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to Ricardo)

quote:

Look at this sloppy work of Faustino (or was it a conversion by someone?)

Hard to say, picture’s not big enough.

The only sure thing about it is, it is a little sloppy, this is true, but not horribly so. It actually doesn’t look that bad to me. My Contreras kicks its butt in the looks department and El Burdo’s pre-correction conversion reigns supreme.

I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a conversion, but who knows? It looks like a fake, lol. Is it? Something tells me this might be a loaded question.

P.S. the butterfly buttons on the tuners look Japanese, but the tuners look like the same cheapo Fusteros that are on my Conde, except mine has normal buttons. Also, kind of joking about the fake thing. The head has the same “feel” as the head on mine, except the string slot ramps on mine are better executed.

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 2 2020 20:52:52

Echi

Posts: 1132
Joined: Jan. 11 2013

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to Ricardo)

Original Faustino of the sixties.
Many headstocks of Barbero are not less sloppy.

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 2 2020 21:50:11

RobF

Posts: 1611
Joined: Aug. 24 2017

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to Echi)

Mine. Not much difference there, to my eyes. But, in no way do I claim any expertise on Condes. Sorry for the lighting, too, it’s raining out and I almost destroyed my living room trying to find a spot to lean the thing. Is this where everyone jumps in and tells me mine’s a fake?

Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 2 2020 22:18:17

El Burdo

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011

[Deleted]

Post has been moved to the Recycle Bin at Dec. 21 2022 21:12:57

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 3 2020 0:08:43

El Burdo

Posts: 632
Joined: Sep. 8 2011

[Deleted]

Post has been moved to the Recycle Bin at Dec. 21 2022 21:13:19

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 3 2020 0:20:09

RobF

Posts: 1611
Joined: Aug. 24 2017

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to El Burdo)

Ooops. Sorry about that, I didn’t realize the first conversion was your handiwork.

I would have been a lot more tactful. All’s well that ends well, though, and as you said, it’s all about the learning and constant improvement.

Estabananana has done some head cloaking jobs to great effect. Pretty near invisible work when he’s done.

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 3 2020 0:46:07

RobF

Posts: 1611
Joined: Aug. 24 2017

RE: Ramirez blancas from 1950 (in reply to Ricardo)

quote:

Look at this sloppy work of Faustino (or was it a conversion by someone?)

Back to your guitar. That it has the same tuners as mine makes me think it probably left the shop that way, so not a conversion. The difference in slot dimensions between the two is likely just due to the two guitars being from different eras, with mine being later (if yours was made in the 60’s, as Echi indicates). Makers or shops aren’t locked in to any one method, after all, and do change how they do things.

Or perhaps their process was to prepare the heads to a fixed angle and leave the decision to slot or peg for later. Or maybe they slotted peg head guitars after the fact, based on demand, so shop executed, pre-sale conversions. Doing either could lead to the slots being cut by a different person than the one who carved the head and explain differences in slotting styles. But, this is just speculation on my part. If anyone knows the answer, it would be interesting to hear.

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jul. 3 2020 10:19:13