Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated?   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Leñador

Posts: 5237
Joined: Jun. 8 2012
From: Los Angeles

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to estebanana

quote:

If there is a need for something, there will be demand.

Indeed but just because there is demand does not mean there is a need. Like that Dutch tulip situation and Justin Bieber.
I think Marx idea was to be rid of anything non-essential, he didn't strike me as a lover of art but I could be wrong.

_____________________________

\m/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2017 15:07:03
 
estebanana

Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Anders Eliasson

quote:

Your analisis of Marx is useless because you analyse from a liberalist point of view. Marx was never interested in demand but in need. Thats something completely different.


All Marx wanted is to express that intellectual labor should not have more value than physical labor that produces a work product that can be sold. The bean counters and the mangers and land holders are not elevated above the worker producing the goods and services. Which is really funny when you read Leonardo Da Vinci's notebooks on art practice. Da Vinci said intellectual labor produces the higher concepts that make great art and artisans are the hands that make the work product, but are of lesser stature than the artist who is the conceptual master.

Marx and Da Vinci would be at loggerheads on how to make art. Da Vinci wanted the artist to get paid more and take more credit, than the laborers that fabricated a sculpture or a building, Marx wanted the Architect and the hands that shouldered plasterers hods of wet lime and cement to be treated more equally.

At a certain point I thought Leonardo was a real *a-Hole and a filthy arrogant counter revolutionary who never finished his most important paintings. Then as I got older and realized I would like to exploit a worker who could French Polish my guitars I began to see his point. But since most guitar makers are more like Michelangelo, or at least I am, I can understand kicking all the workers out of the Sistine Chapel and doing the whole mess by myself with one guy handing me chisels. Only the guy handing me chisels is me. I am my own exploitable assistant and conceptual master of the studio. Which logically means I have out done Michelangelo, from a Marxist perspective.

So most guitars makers who work alone should be paid at least as well as old Bounarotti. Therefore, I demand to see the Pope for my paycheck.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2017 15:07:34
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

The simple fact is value is created in the market place by both supply and demand. It does not matter whether demand is fueled by a real "need" or just someone's passing fancy. If the demand is there, someone will supply it, and the intersection of supply and demand will determine the value. Again, by omitting demand from his "Labor Theory of Value," Marx was off the mark. Laborers can put in hours and hours of labor producing square bicycle wheels, but their hours of labor will not result in any value because there will be no demand for a product that cannot be used. Demand, whether propelled by "need" or frivolous fancy, is the driving force behind value.

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2017 15:45:18
 
Leñador

Posts: 5237
Joined: Jun. 8 2012
From: Los Angeles

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

I'm with you, I'm not a Marx fan, I love capitalism, I'd be stuck in the same socioeconomic status I was born in without it. I'm just explaining how I interpreted Marx flaws logic.

_____________________________

\m/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2017 17:56:37
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to BarkellWH

Let me take a stab at the question of what determines the value of a guitar. First, I would say the labor of the luthier that goes into producing the guitar creates intrinsic value because he produces an instrument that is in demand because of the quality of sound, the playability, and other elements that make the instrument what it is. But it is because the luthier produces a guitar that is recognized as an instrument of quality, i.e., that is in demand, that gives the instrument its value.

Regarding the question, are some guitars overpriced, even if made by maestros like Manuel Reyes, Ramirez, and their peers? What is meant by overpriced? They are considered superb guitars by and large, and Reyes, Ramirez, et. al. have the name factor. There are only a limited number of their instruments available, so when one comes on the market and commands a hefty price, the answer in economic terms is it commands a price that the market will bear. In other words, it is our old friend "demand" that determines the guitar's value.

It is hard for me to come to terms with the idea of something being overpriced if it sells. A guitar, a work of art, a rare book, or a rare manuscript will command what the market will bear. And there are collectors who create some of that extraordinary demand. If it does not sell, then it is overpriced and will be put away or the price lowered. In other words, the Law of Supply (of such instruments and artifacts) and Demand will determine their value.

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 13 2017 21:13:10
 
estebanana

Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

That is a good summation Bill, remember provenance and auction records- provenance includes who is well known who plays a guitar of the same house or label. Guitars are generally valued the same way art and violins are, the same basic format.

Your summation gives a good idea or refutation to the idea that someone is overrated- If the market can bear heavy trade in a particular maker and the consensus is that maker is generally pretty good, they logically that label is not overrated. Overrated gets weeded of the market fast in most cases.

The only thing I would add is that guitars have not yet entered the same realm of value in the market as commodities or what I like to call place makers for money. I'm not saying gutiars are not worthy, they just have not made into that category, yet. Even the most expensive Torres is 46 million behind the Strad viola that sold last year setting a record price for Stradivari and for a violin.

Last year a Titian painting sold for 32 million, the Strad viola, the second rarest of Stradivari's output beat it by 14 million. And we know 14 million is a lot of canoli. several guitar collections of the best of the best could be bought for 14 mil. Strad's shop only turned out about ten violas so when they come to market in the future, watch out. His celli will also go through the roof.

If I had a Torres I would hold on to it. The thing that is irrational about the market is that as soon as the big collectors, the guy that can drop 50 million on a painting gets a taste for guitars and begin buying them from the collectors who have big holdings now, then that tier of trade catches onto guitars several things will happen to drive up prices. Here are two examples: One, the boys will compete with each other in a high stakes horse trading game, just like the guys who buy and sell guitars in the $5000.00 to $ 40,000 range or more, the guys who can sling around several million for art to out bid the other boys will do it as a sport. It is competitive, and compulsive to beat th other guy out to get the prize guitar. Instead of the rarest prewar Martin being close to $300,000 there are markets where it could trade for the same price as the Titian that sold last year.

The other reason the prices could go through the ceiling at auction is because if the kind of collector that can afford to spend 25 million on a guitar will get into the market to intentionally drive up the auction price so that they can donate the guitar to a museum and get a bigger tax write off for the donation or to look better and be a more valuable asset to the museum and have more sway with the museum officials. The market for high dollar art item is sometimes driven by a competition between collectors who want to be the one to make the donation to a museum that needs a particular work of art to make its collection more complete.

When the latter scenario happens then all manner of shenanigans are possible. There are experts called into give opinions on authenticity to make sure it really is what the seller clams it is etc. There have been fights in the art world that last for decades over whether or not the experts opinion was true or not. I have heard and read some terrific stories, but another time. Then a host of different kinds of insurance and commission fees and payouts arise to keep the item in the high dollar market, those fees need to be paid from the sellers profits and so are paid forward into the final starting bid or backroom asking price.

Anyway, there are lots of things that drive up price when the guitar gets into higher dollar markets. Eventually I think some 20th century and many 19th century guitars will get there. If you look at the price structuring of Stradivari and other Italian masters 150 years to 50 years after their death, the price model for master guitars is a bit behind them, but not by a lot. I think in fifty to a hundred years you won't be able to touch a Torres, literally and price wise, for under a great, great amount of money. And the price will have nothing to do with labor vs. demand.


Here is link to an article which shows how much provenance now plays in guitar sales in the top tier. Individual maker s not as important as label! The most expensive auction record setters are almost all factory jobs that cost under $1000 brand new. Go figure. So by this trend the most high dollar guitar is worth one 23rd of what the most expensive viola is worth. I can see the market going hog wild in the next 20 years on vintage Strats, but hold onto your Fleta longer to get the cool million. But who knows.


http://proguitarshop.com/andyscorner/10-most-expensive-guitars-ever-so-far

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2017 0:22:17
 
Echi

 

Posts: 1132
Joined: Jan. 11 2013
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

quote:

It is hard for me to come to terms with the idea of something being overpriced if it sells. A guitar, a work of art, a rare book, or a rare manuscript will command what the market will bear.

The market is not neutral though.
I already said in this 3d that I had the rare chance to speak openly with a a couple of top dealers of flamenco guitars. The same people you can find many video on the tube of.
The dealers promote deliberately some guitars in spite of others in order to improve their business.
As Ricardo said, availability is important for them as consistency and a certain endorsement.
I have been told, literally: "such a builder sells now for tot money, we have an agreement with him that he will sell for tot next year and he will grow up in some years as we have to provide a certain product (and a secure investment) for the top segment of our offer".
This way they do not pay the guitars on consignment and have better conditions than others.
Some guitars (and I'm not referring to Reyes here) cost a lot just for good marketing practices and not as they are better guitars.

Coming back to mr Reyes, I'm sure there are fantastic Reyes guitars out there.
I'm also sure that many of them will be bought by mediocre players dreaming for the top guitar you could buy.
I for one love the tone of Amigo and I really enjoy listening Rey playing his Reyes but I've tried a Reyes guitar that wasn't as good as I thought. I prefer other guitars and I'm blessed I've not to pay for the marketing charges.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2017 12:37:12
 
Piwin

Posts: 3559
Joined: Feb. 9 2016
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Echi

quote:

Some guitars (and I'm not referring to Reyes here) cost a lot just for good marketing practices and not as they are better guitars

I was hoping someone would bring that up. This whole supply and demand discussion seemed to be omiting that we live in a world where some people have become experts at manufacturing demand. Saying there is demand or there isn't, and the buck stops there, gives an incomplete picture of the world we live in.

I don't think Reyes is overrated at all. Overpricing is another issue. I think he deserves the admiration he gets as a builder. That being said, I've tried 3 Reyes so far, and I never got that "gut feeling" that I get with a guitar I like and just might actually buy. I've never felt that with a Conde either, and I've tried dozens of those.
Maybe my gut feeling is the problem, but that's pretty much all I have to go on as a guitarist. If I'm going to buy an instrument, any discussion on the qualities of the guitar is just an ad hoc rationalization for me. It clicks or it doesn't. And sometimes it clicks with a piece of scrap and sometimes it doesn't click with a guitar built by a master, in which case I'll just admire the qualities of that guitar from afar as I can enjoy it yet have no desire whatsoever to play it myself. That's pretty much my feeling of the Reyes I've tried thus far. Admiration, but from a distance. So goes it.

_____________________________

"Anything you do can be fixed. What you cannot fix is the perfection of a blank page. What you cannot fix is that pristine, unsullied whiteness of a screen or a page with nothing on it—because there’s nothing there to fix."
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2017 12:59:46
 
RobJe

 

Posts: 731
Joined: Dec. 16 2006
From: UK

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Echi

Manuel Senior is dead. He doesn’t charge anything. He doesn’t have to worry about whether he is overrated, what price he should charge or how big his waiting list has become.

Dealers charge what they can get and hype up their stock. It’s what dealers do. Get over it.

So if there is a problem we can only blame ourselves.

Rob
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2017 14:07:55
 
Echi

 

Posts: 1132
Joined: Jan. 11 2013
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

I clearly stated I was not specifically referring to Reyes in this case.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 14 2017 17:06:03
 
sartorius

Posts: 206
Joined: Mar. 7 2017
 

RE: Is Manuel Reyes Sr. overrated? (in reply to Leñador

What happens to Reyes guitars is the same to what happens to art pieces. Speculation and investment matters come in.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 16 2017 8:35:07
Page:   <<   <   1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: <<   <   1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.0625 secs.