Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





early history of rondeñas   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1] 2 3    >   >>
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Steelhead

 

Posts: 89
Joined: Nov. 20 2014
 

early history of rondeñas 

I recently came across a manuscript from the 1890s, with a transcription of rondeña as played by Francisco Rodriguez Murciano (1795-1848), who is regarded as a progenitor of flamenco guitar and who was known for his manner of playing rondeña (as notated in this MS by a student of his). This rondeña bears no resemblance to that later popularized by Ramon Montoya (in Db Phrygian, with the distinctive guitar tuning), nor to the verdiales-type rondeñas dance genre of Málaga. It basically sits in E Phrygian, in free rhythm, with a lot of arpeggios, tremolo etc. I have no idea what distinguishes it as rondeña. Does anyone here have any insight into the relation between these things?

_____________________________

Steelhead
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 21 2015 18:57:13
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Steelhead

show it to us, and we can have more to go on. I have some ideas already but it would be better to see the score first.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 23 2015 5:04:47
 
aloysius

Posts: 233
Joined: Apr. 7 2005
From: Adelaide, Australia

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Steelhead

The Russian composer Mikhail Glinka met El Murciano while visiting Spain. Apparently he was quite impressed and tried to transcribe to paper what El Murciano was playing - however Murciano improvised constantly and was unable to play the same thing the same way twice. As far as I know most of what is written down of his playing consists of Glinka's attempts at remembering his improvising, although apparently there is also a Malagueña that was transcribed by his son. In one of Glinka's travel notebooks is a transcription titled "Rondeña con variaciones para guitarra compuesta por Francisco Rodríguez Murciano"

Rondeña as a form dates from at least as far back as the 18th century (according to Gamboa) as a variant of fandangos (fandangos has been around since the 17th century at least). It's tricky to say when a form like Rondeña first came to be considered a flamenco form - in the 19th century many guitarists played what were known as 'aires nacionales', from Andalusia and elsewhere, often as well as classical parlour pieces from the sor/aguado tradition. Arcas composed a rondeña, also E phrygian, that Manuel de Falla later studied.

_____________________________

www.guitarsketches.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 23 2015 8:45:40
 
aloysius

Posts: 233
Joined: Apr. 7 2005
From: Adelaide, Australia

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Steelhead

I just found 2 very comprehensive papers on El Murciano and his rondeña, both by Eusebio Rioja:

http://www.sinfoniavirtual.com/flamenco/flamenco_murciano.pdf

http://www.jondoweb.com/archivospdf/murciano.pdf

_____________________________

www.guitarsketches.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 23 2015 9:31:43
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to aloysius

quote:

ORIGINAL: aloysius

I just found 2 very comprehensive papers on El Murciano and his rondeña, both by Eusebio Rioja:

http://www.sinfoniavirtual.com/flamenco/flamenco_murciano.pdf

http://www.jondoweb.com/archivospdf/murciano.pdf


wow, all that and NO SCORE of the guys playing??

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 15:49:00
 
Richard Jernigan

Posts: 3430
Joined: Jan. 20 2004
From: Austin, Texas USA

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: aloysius

I just found 2 very comprehensive papers on El Murciano and his rondeña, both by Eusebio Rioja:

http://www.sinfoniavirtual.com/flamenco/flamenco_murciano.pdf

http://www.jondoweb.com/archivospdf/murciano.pdf


wow, all that and NO SCORE of the guys playing??

Typical of flamencología, at least until fairly recently.

RNJ
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 19:31:41
 
runner

 

Posts: 357
Joined: Dec. 5 2008
From: New Jersey USA

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Richard Jernigan

I have long been a confirmed agnostic about any and all explanations of the origin of flamenco. The best parallel to the phenomenon of flamenco is the Blues, and there is an uncanny similarity of resemblance in the published efforts to tease out the histories of both genres. As a mild diversion from flamencologia, I recommend browsing idly through "Origin of the Blues" on, say, Wikipedia, and seeing what comes up--you can easily interchange one undocumented and mysterious art form with the other.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 20:44:14
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to runner

quote:

I have long been a confirmed agnostic about any and all explanations of the origin of flamenco.


I can totally agree with that. The funny thing is that most people that talk about flamenco are spewing out hypotheses, theories, and anecdotes of flamencologists. Lol What irony?

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 20:59:18
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to runner

quote:

I have long been a confirmed agnostic about any and all explanations of the origin of flamenco.


Agreed, except in the most general terms, such as, inter-alia, the Moorish, Sephardic, and Gypsy influence on the genre as we know it. It clearly did not begin with the 17th century fandangos and 18th century rondenas mentioned in a comment above, but when those forms were appropriated by and absorbed into the genre is anybody's guess. It certainly happened much later, after flamenco had become a recognized genre sometime in the mid to late 19th century.

What should not be forgotten is flamenco began as cante. It did not begin with guitar work, be it 17th century, 18th century, or otherwise. It began as cante, and the guitar was later incorporated into it as an accompanying instrument, and I imagine it was pretty crude accompaniment at the time (at least by today's standards).

But no, one cannot point to a definitive point in time or a particular set of circumstances and have that Eureka Moment and say, "Ah, so that was the origin of flamenco!"

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 22:11:59
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to BarkellWH

quote:

What should not be forgotten is flamenco began as cante. It did not begin with guitar work, be it 17th century, 18th century, or otherwise. It began as cante, and the guitar was later incorporated into it as an accompanying instrument, and I imagine it was pretty crude accompaniment at the time (at least by today's standards).


Who said? There are good arguments against this including anecdotal material from early guitarists including Fernando el de Triana and singers as well.

quote:

But no, one cannot point to a definitive point in time or a particular set of circumstances and have that Eureka Moment and say, "Ah, so that was the origin of flamenco!"


Several writers are looking at 1880/81 as years in which flamenco began to coalesce as a form someone today could go back to and recognize. Not saying I agree but some of these arguments are more convincing than "Oh, flamenco started as just singing without accompaniment" which is also received, untested anecdotal information.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 22:20:48
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Kevin

For me, because it is SO hard to deal with what is written about flamenco of the PRESENT, anything before recordings is just conjecture...as worthy as any opinion of a concert someone relates to you that you missed but they saw last week. A score is something tangible...even if it is all wrong it is something at least. Can nobody dig up the actual Glinka score???? The Arcas stuff? I mean...just LOOK at it! I mean play it. Cheezy watered down flamingo. Same with the Marin "method"...it's not hardcore stuff the actual flamencos were performing, or capable of IMO.


The earliest recordings I have heard are from Juan Gandulla accompanying cante, like 1909 or before... I personally find it hard to believe, as solid and standardized his toque is there, that what he is doing evolved out of a music form established less than 20 years prior. Doesn't make sense to my inner being...but that is just me and it is just conjecture of course.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 22:58:46
 
guitarbuddha

 

Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo



I personally find it hard to believe, as solid and standardized his toque is there, that what he is doing evolved out of a music form established less than 20 years prior.


'Rock Around the Clock' Bill Hailey version 1954
'Johny B Good' 1958
'Hey Joe Hendrix Version' 1966

Black Sabbath Black Sabbath 1970
Master of Puppets Metallica 1986

Earl Skruggs joins Bill Monroe 1945
Newgrass Revival with Bela Fleck formed 1971


Remarkable yes, impossible no.

D.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 23:16:12
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

For me, because it is SO hard to deal with what is written about flamenco of the PRESENT, anything before recordings is just conjecture...as worthy as any opinion of a concert someone relates to you that you missed but they saw last week.

Are you saying flamenco begins in 1895 with the first recordings?

quote:

The Arcas stuff? I mean...just LOOK at it! I mean play it. Cheezy watered down flamingo. Same with the Marin "method"...it's not hardcore stuff the actual flamencos were performing, or capable of IMO.

Marin has a problem but I don't agree at all that it is the one you ascribe to him. His problem is that he was trying to render in written notation something that had never notated before. Viewed at this way, you can see he was trying to notate seguiriyas (2/4-6/8-1/4) although it doesn't quite get it. Compare his material with the recordings of that time and he is not at all that far off. He mostly plays compas with few falsetas but flamenco was primarily accompaniment at that time. I think it is amazing he was able to capture flamenco at all in notation.

Gandulla is not standarized, he is one of the ones who set the standard. Big difference. And, there could be a larger social context in which he was working that was not flamenco. There were popular versions of seguiriya and solea back to early 1800 not flamenco.


quote:

personally find it hard to believe, as solid and standardized his toque is there, that what he is doing evolved out of a music form established less than 20 years prior. Doesn't make sense to my inner being...but that is just me and it is just conjecture of course.

That's like saying "I find it hard to believe that what early rappers or rock-n-rollers did evolved out of..." Right back to square one.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 23:19:40
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Kevin

I am not saying flamenco "begins" in 1890...rather, THAT is where we can start talking about nuts and bolts of it... what I hear is that the first recordings show the masters of the genre already had the sh it together for a long while.

I could be totally wrong but what then is the evidence that supports THIS is "cutting edge" "new" stuff for it's time?

I feel his stuff (guitar wise) is solid enough that he has been doing it a loooong time already...I am talking structure, technique, feel, etc...it seems all there....especially the ending:

http://youtu.be/J8yXO5g6xmk

not even going to talk about what the singer is doing here...off the chart.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 23:25:54
 
guitarbuddha

 

Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

What then is the evidence that supports THIS is "cutting edge" for the day?

I feel his stuff is solid enough that he has been doing it a loooong time already...I am talking structure, technique, feel, etc...it seems all there:




Here too.

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 23:28:37
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to guitarbuddha

quote:

ORIGINAL: guitarbuddha

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

What then is the evidence that supports THIS is "cutting edge" for the day?

I feel his stuff is solid enough that he has been doing it a loooong time already...I am talking structure, technique, feel, etc...it seems all there:




Here too.




Right but I could point you to the original sabicas from the 50's, then the seminal Montoya recordings that Inspired Sabics, and prove that the music the young Grisha is playing has been around since before his dad was born. But we can't do such a thing with poor Mr. Gandulla...but why not infer it?

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 24 2015 23:42:54
 
guitarbuddha

 

Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo



What then is the evidence that supports THIS is "cutting edge" for the day?

I feel his stuff is solid enough that he has been doing it a loooong time already...I am talking structure, technique, feel, etc...it seems all there:


Right but I could point you to the original sabicas from the 50's, then the seminal Montoya recordings that Inspired Sabics, and prove that the music the young Grisha is playing has been around since before his dad was born. But we can't do such a thing with poor Mr. Gandulla...but why not infer it?



I did not infer any such thing. And why stop at Sabicas loads of stuff in Montoya looks and sounds like Aguado just like a lot of Charlie Christian is a lot like country blues.

I am INSINUATING two things with my last two posts. One that a unique style can emerge fully formed in a very short time and there is ample documentary evidence of this such as the exampled I cited above. Two that a gifted hard working and hard listening performer can get to the bottom of it in a short time and even on an instrument new to the style or acting independantly of the tradition. Here again I rely on documentary evidence since it I am not one of those people.

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 0:12:37
 
Ricardo

Posts: 14799
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to guitarbuddha

Likewise I have not been insinuating that it is not a "possibility"... but rather, I am not yet convinced by the existing evidence. Paco de Lucia has that little silly quote poking fun (IMO) at Sor.... so imagine if in the future some musicologist notices that and says.. "Paco came along with influences taken directly from the classical player technique..." it is ridiculous. That is the kind of stuff I have read from flamenco historians.

EDIT...the reason I would "stop" at Sabicas, is because I know enough about the genre to ID the source material.

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 0:32:39
 
guitarbuddha

 

Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricardo

Likewise I have not been insinuating that it is not a "possibility"... but rather, I am not yet convinced by the existing evidence.


And that is all we are discussing.... 'What is possible ?', so much is possible that 'probable' is a leap for anyone.

Anyway we have been talking about this for over eight years now. The Sor, the Aguado, the documentary evidence. The pathological science of self appointed flamencologists. Not much changes.

D.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 0:49:47
 
runner

 

Posts: 357
Joined: Dec. 5 2008
From: New Jersey USA

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to guitarbuddha

I agree completely with the premise that a new genre like flamenco, rock, or the blues can materialize very quickly out of the most threadbare suggestions of ancestral materials. Again, the Zeitgeist. Leonard Meyer of the U of Chicago music department wrote extensively about this phenomenon, and gave an average of 15 years for a new genre, trend, school to appear in the several arts, and to become established, thence to just as inevitably begin a somewhat slower slouch into decadence--and one can argue as much about the decadence of an art form as about its origins. There is a wonderful quote by Ortega y Gasset that says: "In the great hour of the decline of the genre...the opportunity of achieving the perfect work is excellent...when accumulated experience has utterly refined the artistic sensitivity." To my mind, this perfectly explains the phenomenon of Led Zeppelin in rock. And you can insert whichever flamenco great names into this equation that you see fit. And then we can argue over them!
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 1:55:12
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

"Paco came along with influences taken directly from the classical player technique..." it is ridiculous. That is the kind of stuff I have read from flamenco historians.
Who? Which historian?

Montoya studied with Llobet man. To what end and what extent is not known. The cuerda pelaa style is flamenco. Arpegios, tremolo and picado were not part of flamenco, at least not according to received knowledge, until Montoya. Montoya wasn't trying to play classical anymore than Paco was trying to play jazz with the trio, but flamenco would probably not be what it is without Montoya's influence (influenced by Llobet).

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 5:01:25
 
aloysius

Posts: 233
Joined: Apr. 7 2005
From: Adelaide, Australia

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Ricardo

quote:

The earliest recordings I have heard are from Juan Gandulla accompanying cante, like 1909 or before... I personally find it hard to believe, as solid and standardized his toque is there, that what he is doing evolved out of a music form established less than 20 years prior. Doesn't make sense to my inner being...but that is just me and it is just conjecture of course.

There is a great recording by the Centro Andaluz de Flamenco called "Cilindros de Cera. Primeras grabaciones de Flamenco." It's 2 CDs of remastered wax cylinder recordings from 1890 - 1905. The earliest of these would be some 20 years before the first Juan Gandulla recordings. The guitar on these recordings is pretty crude, especially compared to the cante which feels already highly developed. I don't think this proves that cante existed for a long time without the guitar, but it maybe shows that the guitar was not considered such a big deal back then.

As for Marin, there are 2 distinct styles of playing in his method - his own descriptions of flamenco players at the time, which matches pretty closely the earliest recordings (a highly developed thumb, very simple arps with pi or pim etc) and his written out pieces which seem to be written for the classical guitarist. In some of the text he seems to be proposing a way forward for flamenco in terms of expanded arps, tremolo etc, but he certainly had a non-flamenco audience in mind, and I'd say his written pieces were tailored to that audience.

_____________________________

www.guitarsketches.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 9:44:24
 
Pimientito

Posts: 2481
Joined: Jul. 30 2007
From: Marbella

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to aloysius

I think its important to distinguish between what was possible on the guitar back then and how the guitar was used in Flamenco. It was not used so much as a solo instrument like today. If one listens to those old recordings of Augustin Barrios from around 1900 its clear that some players had as much technique as today. We can hear Llobet from around 1920 here.



We cant know for sure but I believe that Arcas and Tarrega were similarly brilliant. It is said that Montoya developed Tremelo in flamenco after seeing a classical player but I did not know he directly studied with Llobet. What is clear though is that classical players had already developed a high level of technique that Flamenco could "borrow" from.

_____________________________

Follow my blog http://pimientito.wordpress.com/

"Ceremonial" by Mark Shurey "Pimientito". CD and digital download vailable on Amazon and
CDbaby. http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/markshurey
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 10:34:39
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to runner

quote:

There is a wonderful quote by Ortega y Gasset that says: "In the great hour of the decline of the genre...the opportunity of achieving the perfect work is excellent...when accumulated experience has utterly refined the artistic sensitivity."


I first read Jose Ortega y Gasset while at university decades ago, and I was captivated by his writing and insights. Ortega y Gasset's seminal work, "La Rebelion de las Masas" ("The Revolt of the Masses"), published in 1930, has initially fooled many first-time readers by its title. Contrary to the title's implication, that it is a work extolling the masses coming to power, it is exactly the opposite. It laments the deadening, lowest common denominator effect on everything, from art, music, and culture writ large, to thinking and politics, that the coming of "mass man" has wrought. He contrasts all that is noble in man with all that is common.

Ortega y Gasset was a liberal, elected to the Cortes in 1931 in the Republican government of Spain. But he was appalled by the "masses" then, and I'm sure he would be today as well. And he defined "mass man" widely as being not only the lower class of society, but the complacent, self-satisfied bourgeoisie as well. He defined European decadence of the '30s.

Here is a quote from the first chapter, "The Coming of the Masses."

"The characteristic of the hour is that the commonplace mind, knowing itself to be commonplace, has the assurance to proclaim the rights of the commonplace and to impose them wherever it will. As they say in the United States: 'to be different is to be indecent.' The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated."

The quote cited above could have been lifted from Nietzsche's "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," but then Nietzsche, with his wonderful insights and aphorisms, railed as well against the common mass attempting to bring anyone with noble thoughts, ability, and insights down to the lowest common denominator.

I have always remembered one of Nietszche's aphorism from his work "The Joyful Wisdom," one that easily could have been written by Ortega y Gasset:

"Look, look, he runs away from men. They follow him, however, because he runs before them. They are a gregarious lot!"

I still have my original copy of "The Revolt of the Masses," and I see how it remains relevant today.

Cheers,

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 13:18:33
 
guitarbuddha

 

Posts: 2970
Joined: Jan. 4 2007
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to BarkellWH

Hi Bill, strange you thought of that quote.

Have you read 'Outer Dark' (by our old favourite Cormac McCarthy) ? There is a hilarious scene where a self anointed 'preacher' attempts to organise a lynching and finds nothing but compliance from his marks.

In the book it sure seems like fun for the majority and very worthwhile. Sheep may be gregarious it is true but they also love to be lead, even in pursuit and from the rear.

I wish I could admire the preacher and his ilk as much as others do, but I cannot.

D.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 16:35:22
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Steelhead

quote:

I wish I could admire the preacher and his ilk as much as others do, but I cannot.


Was just reading through Arcas' Rondenas, especially the sections of arranged cante (cancion) melody. Arcas was not a flamenco guitarist but the use of arpegios, the cante arrangement, suggests to me that these classical guitarists and early flamencos were all drinking from the same fountains and borrowing from each other.
Then I clicked on here to find a rant about Gassett y Ortega. WTH?

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 16:59:37
 
runner

 

Posts: 357
Joined: Dec. 5 2008
From: New Jersey USA

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to BarkellWH

I've put in an interlibrary loan request for The Revolt of the Masses, and am looking forward to reading it. The quote I submitted, that I feel fits the phenomenon of Led Zeppelin so well, comes from Notes on the Novel. The advent of the Internet, of ubiquitous social media, of masses of people with antennae attuned to constant interaction with others (when do they quietly think?) may bring wholly new effects into play to both homogenize and to fragment a postulated Group Mind. Turning again to Leonard Meyer's work, he in the 1960s foresaw the arts evolving (or dissolving) into essentially Brownian motion--random micro trends popping up within small populations of devotees, and then just as rapidly evaporating into nothingness-- a Quantum Theory of future art? It will be useful to have Ortega y Gasset's views on the subject, as a pre-digital fixed point.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 17:19:38
 
Paul Magnussen

Posts: 1805
Joined: Nov. 8 2010
From: London (living in the Bay Area)

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Pimientito

quote:

We can hear Llobet from around 1920 here.


Thanks for posting that. It seems to me that I can very much hear the influence of the Llobet/Anido duo on Presti/Lagoya.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 17:35:24
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to Kevin

quote:

Then I clicked on here to find a rant about Gassett y Ortega. WTH


Not a rant (It is Ortega y Gasset, by the way). Rather, my post was in praise of him. One thing you should have learned by now is that an oblique reference to something or someone in a thread (such as Runner's to Ortega y Gasset regarding Led Zeppelin) can turn the thread in an entirely different direction. And that won't prevent the thread from returning to the original topic either. That's the beauty of the Foro and its many members with a shared interest in flamenco, but with varied interests and experiences each brings to the table.

Cheers,

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 20:14:07
 
Kevin

 

Posts: 294
Joined: Sep. 7 2008
 

RE: early history of rondeñas (in reply to BarkellWH

quote:

Not a rant (It is Ortega y Gasset, by the way). Rather, my post was in praise of him.

What is the difference? Why is the contrast of all that is noble in man with all that is common relevant to this thread? What possesses the "lowest common denominator" in this thread?
quote:

One thing you should have learned by now is that an oblique reference to something or someone in a thread (such as Runner's to Ortega y Gasset regarding Led Zeppelin) can turn the thread in an entirely different direction.

Yup. I still get utterly disgusted that sincere inquiry into something like the evolution of Rondena on pop and flamenco guitar gets turned into, if not a rant, surely a disguised diatribe about how common people want to make everything common. It reeks of anti-intellectualism while it peddles pedantry.

But proceed!!! Expound on what exactly ORTEGA y GASSET has to do with this thread and the people that are discussing Rondena. (As I return to relearning some old Verdiales, Jaberas, and Rondenas)

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Mar. 25 2015 20:39:42
Page:   [1] 2 3    >   >>
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: [1] 2 3    >   >>
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.09375 secs.