RE: Flamenco and Classical Guitars

Costs are rising and times are tough.
Please consider a donation to keep this
place going.

Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.

RE: Flamenco and Classical Guitars - Differences

You are logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >>

Page: << < 1 [2]

Message

<< Newer Topic Older Topic >>

mezzo

Posts: 1409
Joined: Feb. 18 2010
From: .fr

RE: Flamenco and Classical Guitars -... (in reply to estebanana)

quote:

I'm not going to explain it. I'm going to let that stand as is because it is provocative. People should do their own thinking.

Nice preventive answer.

_____________________________

"The most important part of Flamenco is not in knowing how to interpret it. The higher art is in knowing how to listen." (Luis Agujetas)

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date May 15 2014 8:14:49

Gildeavalle

Posts: 47
Joined: Oct. 26 2012
From: Granada

RE: Flamenco and Classical Guitars -... (in reply to rojarosguitar)

Yes, Torresepithicus Robustus was the starting point, the different types of music and the guitar players' requests was what shaped the contemporary guitar classical or flamenca.
Flamenco: woods with less density and less body witdth so that the sound get it out of the body in a faster and stronger way, which is the base of Flamenco music.
Classical: woods with more density that define the personality of the guitar and give more harmonic aspects to the instrument.
And basically, apart from my definitions of classical or flamenco guitar, I always use the following simil when it comes to a simple explanations: the same difference that a woman and a man, they are the same but with few differences at first sight, and a bit more from the organological point of view, their behaviour and how they sound.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Daniel Gil de Avalle Guitar Maker/Luthier:
Classical, Flamenco & Historic Guitars
http://www.gildeavalle.wordpress.com
https://www.facebook.com/guitarrasdegranada

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date May 31 2014 23:58:17

Ricardo

Posts: 14805
Joined: Dec. 14 2004
From: Washington DC

RE: Flamenco and Classical Guitars -... (in reply to rojarosguitar)

I would like to add, I recently acquired an old jeronimo peña fernandez indian and spruce guitar. It has a tap plate but the white plate is covering damage. I have no clue if the instrument was originally a flamenco negra or simply a classical guitar. It has a light weight construction (for a negra I think) but I dont' have a bona fide classical of his to compare. Sound wise, with the strings it had on (savarez) it had a very bright sound but not necessarily percussive and "snappy"....yet it has buzzing in the basses due to the low bridge. I was pretty convinced it was a classical guitar originally by the treble response.

But.....

when I changed the strings to labella 820 red trebles, and let em settle down a few days...man it sure has the snap and punch of a flamenco now. Honestly I was a little disturbed because I have not been putting much weight on string brands contribution to sound and response until this experiment. I always assumed that the strings matter of course, but not to such a degree as to change the concept of what the guitar could be used for!

_____________________________

CD's and transcriptions available here:
www.ricardomarlow.com

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Jun. 1 2014 14:41:05