Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





RE: In praise of shorter nails. . .   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
aeolus

Posts: 765
Joined: Oct. 30 2009
From: Mier

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to britguy

quote:

ounds a bit of an odd size. I didn't know they made #3 buckshot? Why don't you just go with the popular 00 buckshot.

And if you want a bit more OOOmph, try the magnum load. . .

(Works really well on the beavers that rip up my fruit trees. . . .)


Didn't find any listing on line for 20ga. larger than #3. I bought first a box of sabot slug which is a slug encased in plastic the slug being a little over 1/2' dia. but I am concerned that as my shotgun is a 1928 model (it was my mothers bird gun) and as such has a full choke that is to say narrow and measuring the exit point of the barrel there is not much room to spare. Of course it will exit the barrel so what else happens should't be an issue.
You're kinda in over kill with 000 for badgers wouldn't you say?

Checking further it seems #3 is the max. for 20 ga. as with larger pellets they stack-up spoiling a good pattern.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 15:01:50
 
Anders Eliasson

Posts: 5780
Joined: Oct. 18 2006
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Arash

quote:

Are we talking about flamenco or classical guitar?
In flamenco playing with NO NAILS AT ALL is impossible and WILL sound like poop


Sorry Arash, but it doesnt have to be like that. Its sounds like poop when I play without nails and maybe when you do, but I´ve sat next to Niño Miguel, playing without nails. It was chaotic because it was Miguel, but the sound was very earthy and flamenco.
The reason, he had a ton of callus on all his his fingers and he really digged into the soul of the instrument. If that was poop sound, then going to the toilet must hurt like doing concrete.
To much nail, in my ears, often sound to clean and office boy like.

_____________________________

Blog: http://news-from-the-workshop.blogspot.com/
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 15:16:15
 
SephardRick

Posts: 358
Joined: Apr. 11 2014
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Anders Eliasson

quote:

but I´ve sat next to Niño Miguel, playing without nails


Well, that is inspirational when you break a nail.

_____________________________

Rick
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 15:40:29
 
Richard Jernigan

Posts: 3430
Joined: Jan. 20 2004
From: Austin, Texas USA

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to BarkellWH

quote:

ORIGINAL: BarkellWH

You are in good company, Britguy. In 1902, at the age of 50, Francisco Tarrega began cutting his nails as short as he possibly could, apparently because he thought the sound produced was much more to his liking than that produced with nails. He played without nails for the rest of his life.

Cheers,

Bill


From the preface to "F. Tarrega, Doce Composiciones para Guitarra" by Isaias Savio, Ricordi, Buenos Aires:

"En 1900 su salud [de Tarrega] inspiró cuidados por manifestarse la arterio-esclerosis, y el maestro ya no pudo pulsar su guitarra con aquel sonido puro y cristalino que tanto había contribuido a sus éxitos, viéndose en cambio obligado a cortarse las uñas por defectos que en ellas aparecían. Pero no se desanimó por ello, sino que siguió estudiando y conseguió realizar audiciones, aunque no de mucha importancia…."

The publisher and guitar historian Matanya Ophee tells me this is verbatim from "Diccionario de Guitarristas" by Domingo Prat, Buenos Aires. Prat knew Tarrega.

My translation:

"In 1900 Tarrega's health caused concern, due to the appearance of arteriosclerosis, and the maestro was no longer able to play his guitar with the pure and crystalline tone which had contributed so much to his success. Instead, he was obliged to cut his nails due to defects which appeared in them. But he was not discouraged by this, rather he continued practicing, and succeeded in giving concerts, though none of great importance."

Savio and Prat contend that Tarrega cut his nails due to defects in them caused by hardening of the arteries, and that it had negative effects on his tone. This is controversial to some extent. Emilio Pujol, one of Tarrega's later pupils, taught and advocated playing without nails. Miguel Llobet, an earlier and more famous disciple of Tarrega, played with nails.

RNJ
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 15:57:43
 
Ramon Amira

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: Oct. 14 2009
From: New York City

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Arash

quote:

yeah but that doesn't work with flamenco.
you need flesh+nail to get the desired flamenco sound.
otherwise with only flesh, it sounds like warm poop.


Not necessarily . . . . . This says it was recorded without nails.





Ramon

_____________________________

Classical and flamenco guitars from Spain Ramon Amira Guitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:13:21
 
Arash

Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Ramon Amira

As far as I know, Grisha uses these

https://guitarplayernails.com/

In the second video, he HAS nails.... its just short compared to his usual length which is long.
He says "I have no nails", but don't take it literally.
When he says "its not suitable for playing", that means its not suitable for him, he normally has long nails compared to many other players.
I have my nails ALWAYS this short as shown in the video.

Again, people talked about having NO NAILS at all. Thats a completely different story

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:21:08
 
Ramon Amira

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: Oct. 14 2009
From: New York City

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Arash

quote:

As far as I know, Grisha uses these

https://guitarplayernails.com/


Take a look at the second video I added after you read my post. Grisha actually states that he is playing without nails - of any kind - and even shows a close-up of his fingers - no nails.

Ramon

_____________________________

Classical and flamenco guitars from Spain Ramon Amira Guitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:25:14
 
Arash

Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to z6

z6, ok gotcha.
But I would never recommand building up Callus on your finger tips instead of short nails, unless you really have no other choice because of some kind of a problem.

And even with hard callus, I can't imagine to get the full range of
possible sounds which you can get with nail and flesh.
Hearing Nino Miguel is probably always nice, then again he also played a guitar with 2 strings and was still nice.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:28:02
 
Ramon Amira

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: Oct. 14 2009
From: New York City

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to aeolus

Grisha says "I have no nails at all, and what I have is not suitable for playing." I'm sure he would never say that - and there would be no point in saying it - if he was employing nails in way whatsoever. He is specifically making the point that he can produce the sound he produces without the use of nails.

However, I agree with you for the most part - I can't imagine flamenco being played entirely without nails and sounding like anything. Picado is one thing, but I wonder if anyone could make things like arpeggios and tremolo come out, not to merntion raxsgueado.

Ramon

_____________________________

Classical and flamenco guitars from Spain Ramon Amira Guitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:34:29
 
Arash

Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Ramon Amira

quote:

ORIGINAL: Prominent Critic

Grisha says "I have no nails at all, and what I have is not suitable for playing." I'm sure he would never say that - and there would be no point in saying it - if he was employing nails in way whatsoever. He is specifically making the point that he can produce the sound he produces without the use on nails.

Ramon


Please Pause the video at 1:14 and look carefully. Vid quality is bad but you can see them. The White part of the nails.
Must be around 2 mm or so long. Which is around my (and many other players length).

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:38:46
 
Ramon Amira

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: Oct. 14 2009
From: New York City

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Arash

quote:

Please Pause the video at 1:14 and look carefully. Vid quality is bad but you can see them. The White part of the nails.
Must be around 2 mm or so long. Which is around my (and many other players length).


Well, whatever . . . Maybe Grisha can tell us whether or not he used any part of whatever little nail he had.

But in any case, as I said, I agree with you that in general flamenco played entirely without nails can't sound like anything. Except maybe warm poop.

Ramon

_____________________________

Classical and flamenco guitars from Spain Ramon Amira Guitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 18:48:53
 
Richard Jernigan

Posts: 3430
Joined: Jan. 20 2004
From: Austin, Texas USA

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Ramon Amira

quote:

ORIGINAL: Prominent Critic

Grisha says "I have no nails at all, and what I have is not suitable for playing." I'm sure he would never say that - and there would be no point in saying it - if he was employing nails in way whatsoever. He is specifically making the point that he can produce the sound he produces without the use of nails.

However, I agree with you for the most part - I can't imagine flamenco being played entirely without nails and sounding like anything. Picado is one thing, but I wonder if anyone could make things like arpeggios and tremolo come out, not to merntion raxsgueado.

Ramon


In the video Grisha goes on to state that you should always contact the string at the juncture of flesh and nail, and demonstrates. Perhaps he is saying that despite his nails being unsuitably short, he can still produce a brilliant sound by contacting the string at the proper point, and by pushing the string down with the stroke?

I attended the hour and a half master class Grisha and Jeremy Mouffe gave at the University of Texas at Austin Music School, the day before their recent concert here. Grisha had nails. He didn't say whether they were his own natural nails, or the artificial ones he endorses. But he did demonstrate varying the tone quality by altering the angle of attack of the nail on the string.

RNJ
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 20:14:41
 
Ramon Amira

 

Posts: 1025
Joined: Oct. 14 2009
From: New York City

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Richard Jernigan

quote:

In the video Grisha goes on to state that you should always contact the string at the juncture of flesh and nail, and demonstrates. Perhaps he is saying that despite his nails being unsuitably short, he can still produce a brilliant sound by contacting the string at the proper point, and by pushing the string down with the stroke?


Maybe. But in one of the videos the accompanying blurb by Grisha states "Recorded without nails."

Ramon

_____________________________

Classical and flamenco guitars from Spain Ramon Amira Guitars
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 25 2014 20:30:34
 
estebanana

Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Ruphus

quote:

Very true that!

Some manage to add enough or even a lot of flesh despite of long nails.
Usually, however, they seem to be lucky owners of perfectly straight nails.

Ruphus


Or they have dog paws for hands.

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 0:06:26
 
Erik van Goch

 

Posts: 1787
Joined: Jul. 17 2012
From: Netherlands

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Arash

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arash
Please Pause the video at 1:14 and look carefully. Vid quality is bad but you can see them. The White part of the nails.
Must be around 2 mm or so long. Which is around my (and many other players length).


The very few times in my life i really took guitar playing seriously i paired extremely short nails to excellent control and sound. In that periods of time my nails were even shorter then showed in that video. As a matter of fact i came to the conclusion that every molecule of nail visible behind the strings was ballast (frustrating my hard-earned natural relaxation and flow) and as such had to be removed. As a result my nails ended up having the length of a string diameter. Obviously this demands extreme control of your playing (which at the time i had) as well as a technique that supports/use and as such totally depends on having extremely short nails (it totally changed my way of playing). Every single day i had to remove the overnight grown of the nail in order not to get stuck into the strings, that's how precise the mechanism was. I can only do this with various hours of extremely dedicated/efficient training a day over a longer period of time.
If i only play every now and then i need longer nails, using different techniques. You can compare it with old tape recorders (using hard to push/switch buttons) and the later ones (using touch control buttons).

I'm pretty sure that when you grab a string with your nail (were the nail meets the finger tip) and remove every molecule of nail visible behind the string (ending up with a nail up to string diameter level) most of you will consider that (or better said confuse that) with "playing without nails", which in reality is quite a different thing. The idea is that when you hook your nail behind the string it is long enough to assure optimal grip and short enough to pass the string without resistance.... the wind of a blow dryer in low setting should be enough to launch it.

_____________________________

The smaller the object of your focus the bigger the result.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 9:07:35
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to aeolus

quote:

ORIGINAL: estebanana

Or they have dog paws for hands.



Or seal flippers maybe. :OP

One thing that hasn´t been mentioned:

As you will be digging in deeper without nails the movements are being executed more pronounced. Benefitting a well defined neural imprint ( with more discrete sections of the movements).

I think that learning without nails is a very useful way to do. And that what you learned extensively without / with very short nails you will be executing just the more easily in the reduced movement of longer nails later on.

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 9:18:07
 
mark indigo

 

Posts: 3625
Joined: Dec. 5 2007
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Erik van Goch

quote:

The very few times in my life i really took guitar playing seriously i paired extremely short nails to excellent control and sound. In that periods of time my nails were even shorter then showed in that video. As a matter of fact i came to the conclusion that every molecule of nail visible behind the strings was ballast (frustrating my hard-earned natural relaxation and flow) and as such had to be removed. As a result my nails ended up having the length of a string diameter. Obviously this demands extreme control of your playing (which at the time i had) as well as a technique that supports/use and as such totally depends on having extremely short nails (it totally changed my way of playing). Every single day i had to remove the overnight grown of the nail in order not to get stuck into the strings, that's how precise the mechanism was. I can only do this with various hours of extremely dedicated/efficient training a day over a longer period of time.

José Antonio Rodriguez showed me his right hand at a class with him and the nails were so short they didn't extend over the flesh of the fingertip at all - they looked almost like most guitarists left hand.

_____________________________

  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 10:08:03
 
Erik van Goch

 

Posts: 1787
Joined: Jul. 17 2012
From: Netherlands

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to mark indigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo


José Antonio Rodriguez showed me his right hand at a class with him and the nails were so short they didn't extend over the flesh of the fingertip at all - they looked almost like most guitarists left hand.


That's how mine looked as well, as a matter of fact my left hand nails generally are longer then my right hand nails were back then :-)

_____________________________

The smaller the object of your focus the bigger the result.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 10:18:19
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to mark indigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo

- they looked almost like most guitarists left hand.


Is that how it is? ( No rhetorical question.)
With all the questioning on forums about glue, artificial nails etc.pp. I was thinking the fraction of long nails to be prevailing.
- And I always wondered why do they need that. Eventhough my nails have developed thin since many years now they always sufficed for playing demands.
( Only in my times as bar fly not, as I would break my thumb nail all too often. Specially when unlocking my motor bike after a bar hop. Yes, I used to be bonkers.)

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 10:40:05
 
Erik van Goch

 

Posts: 1787
Joined: Jul. 17 2012
From: Netherlands

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Ruphus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ruphus

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo

- they looked almost like most guitarists left hand.


Is that how it is? ( No rhetorical question)


It can be, if it's your cup of tea and your'e able/willing to invest the time and focus needed to obtain/maintain the matching technique.

_____________________________

The smaller the object of your focus the bigger the result.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 11:28:40
 
Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to aeolus

My cousin is such a long-nail player ( doing quite well actually), and I thought long nailers where the majority among us.

Ruphus
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 11:38:09
 
Erik van Goch

 

Posts: 1787
Joined: Jul. 17 2012
From: Netherlands

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to mark indigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: mark indigo

José Antonio Rodriguez showed me his right hand at a class with him .... they looked almost like most guitarists left hand.


I just compared plugging* my guitar with my right hand (longer nails) and my left hand (short nails) and it seems that

* my short nailed/untrained left hand often produce a better sound.
* the left hand nails are still way to long to react on minimal energy inputs... they remain stuck into the strings unless additional force is added (like my even shorter filed right hand experienced in my prime days after only 1 night of nail grown).

That's how short nails can/must be if you embrace zero string resistance, maximum relaxation and minimal input/disturbance of flow.

* i'm not able to plug the string with my short nailed left hand when applying "normal" guitar techniques because the nail won't be anywhere near the string dude to the flesh of the finger tip. But i am able to hook the string behind the nail when i carefully position it there. You will be amazed how much energy is needed to plug the string from that position i.o.w. how much energy is needed to make that small stroke of nail pass the string. You'll meet way less string resistance and could play with way less energy input if you reduced that already very short nail even more. That's exactly what i did in my prime days with my right hand.... start hooking the nail behind the string and make sure it slides of when even the slightest amount of pressure is added (the shorter the nail, the less energy needed to make it leave the string). Over time you will not only be able to do this with the nail carefully positioned/hooked into the string as a starting position, but also when plugging the string out of the air. Over time that few molecules of nail will find the string like a heat-seeking rocked, hitting the target with extreme precision time after time. Without daily practice to obtain/maintain that precision those nails won't be anywhere near the string dude to the flesh of the finger tips.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*I started carefully hooking the nail behind a string (applying optimal hand/finger positions based on proven but potentially optimizable biomechanics)
*Next add pressure on the string without fully plugging it, seeking the point it almost slides of (focus on energy input/relaxation/biomechanics).
*Switch/shuttle between starting position and the moment of almost sliding off (note how shorter nails need less energy input to reach that point of no return and how hand position and point of direction effects the results).
*Also go back in time, lifting and replanting the finger to study how it reaches that known position (focus on relaxation and biomechanics and the impact of making first contact)
*When you gain control (in biomechanics, precision and relaxation) hook the nail behind the sting and shorten the nail up to a point were even the slightest amount of energy input will make it leave the string.
*You'll end up with extremely short nails and incredible flow/control. That's how i did it.

On top of exercises like this i also studied the bigger moves/biomechanics of individual fingers. For arpeggio i would hook all 3 fingers to the matching string and then select 1 finger to (air)plug the string. First i lift that finger as high as possible (without stretching it) and then push it all the way towards the palm of my hand (again as far as possible, training the bigger muscles of the arm). At first i pass the string in the air (focussing on relaxation and biomechanics), then in upwards direction try to touch the string as lightly as possible (making sure the impact doesn't disturb the flow of the move) and then slowly increase the amount of finger/string contact, up to a point were i can hit it full force without disturbing the flow of the movement (this demands pairing perfect biomechanics and movement to perfect precision/relaxation). The more precise and relaxed your finger is the less likely it is to crash into the strings. In general i focus on a point in the distance, not on the actual finger/string interaction (which is studied like above). Hitting a string basically is a side effect of a relaxed finger passing the string on it's way to a point in the distance and as such is purely "accidental". The bigger moves i only apply as a warming up/study to refine biomechanics and to train the bigger arm muscles. In real playing i applied minimal movement with fairly stretched fingers.

_____________________________

The smaller the object of your focus the bigger the result.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 11:46:00
 
BarkellWH

Posts: 3458
Joined: Jul. 12 2009
From: Washington, DC

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to Richard Jernigan

quote:

Savio and Prat contend that Tarrega cut his nails due to defects in them caused by hardening of the arteries, and that it had negative effects on his tone.


Tarrega's health did decline, and I have read where his nails began splitting. This, of course, leads to the conclusion that the sound thus produced with his nails was less to his liking than that produced without nails. For the rest of his life (he died in 1909 at the age of 57) Tarrega cut his nails as short as he possibly could, almost digging into the flesh in order to do so.

Cheers,

Bill

_____________________________

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white,
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here,
Who tried to hustle the East."

--Rudyard Kipling
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 26 2014 13:55:28
 
estebanana

Posts: 9351
Joined: Oct. 16 2009
 

RE: In praise of shorter nails. . . (in reply to aeolus

I was really in my hopes someone would start a thread called in Praise of Shorter Skirts.....

_____________________________

https://www.stephenfaulkguitars.com
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Apr. 27 2014 0:35:18
Page:   <<   <   1 [2]
All Forums >>Discussions >>General >> Page: <<   <   1 [2]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.078125 secs.