Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
RE: Sight more important than sound?
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
Kalo
Posts: 400
Joined: Jan. 25 2011
|
RE: Sight more important than sound? (in reply to Turron)
|
|
|
quote:
People confuse speed and flash with "technique". Malmsteen is fast and sometimes very expressive, yet he rushes the compas all the time to the point it is annoying. Perhaps to unschooled listeners it sounds either like "too many notes" or is simply amazing. Beck always controls the time in a way it feels like he has more knowledge and technique and schooling. Malmsteen sounds un schooled and crazy at times, even when he (and especially when) he attempts to interpret Bach or Paganini... always hap hazard and rushing tempo. Speed is not always technique...but controlling rhythm is. I LOVE IT, not only great advice for flamenco guitarist, but, a Rock Guitarist and SO TRUE quote:
People talk about Moraito music as if it is "easier" or requires LESS technique than others. Ok then please reproduce it? Moraito has a technique and control up there with the rest of the maestros, with an added dimension to it in certain aspects of "soniquete" expression. It is not simply that he is from jerez and "feels" it a certain way, but more importantly that he has a physical and technical ABILITY to produce that "sound" which was many years in the making. Many many hours of repeating the same phrasing until it is natural as speaking or walking. THAT is high technique IMO. People who play music and make it somehow SOUND difficult to play rather than natural and flowing, are actually LACKING in technique skills, yet inevitably get labeled as "technical players". First off, I LOVE Moraito! Second, another GREAT analogy and advice we ALL can benefit from!!! Kalo
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 22 2013 19:19:46
|
|
flamencositar
Posts: 76
Joined: Aug. 8 2012
|
RE: Sight more important than sound? (in reply to Ricardo)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricardo quote:
A single movement, or a perfectly placed note, can create an emotional response in an audience that trumps better technique. You should probably know me by now, I don't prescribe to the bogus "feel vs chops" critique. To examine your description, I consider a "movement" and "perfectly placed note"...directly related to TECHNIQUE and TIMING. As to your other statement, I feel that the person with the BETTER COMPAS is always clearly the more advanced performer. I for one see right through the charismatic "expressive" artist that is trying to cover their limitations with certain shiny objects. Farruco's 'pose" is all technical, to the point it is a natural expression. Try to copy or do better and you confront your own technical limitations, plain and simple. Carpeta a perfect example. What could that baby possibly know about life love and pain such that he can express so well with dance better than anyone of us??? People confuse speed and flash with "technique". Malmsteen is fast and sometimes very expressive, yet he rushes the compas all the time to the point it is annoying. Perhaps to unschooled listeners it sounds either like "too many notes" or is simply amazing. Beck always controls the time in a way it feels like he has more knowledge and technique and schooling. Malmsteen sounds un schooled and crazy at times, even when he (and especially when) he attempts to interpret Bach or Paganini... always hap hazard and rushing tempo. Speed is not always technique...but controlling rhythm is. People talk about Moraito music as if it is "easier" or requires LESS technique than others. Ok then please reproduce it? Moraito has a technique and control up there with the rest of the maestros, with an added dimension to it in certain aspects of "soniquete" expression. It is not simply that he is from jerez and "feels" it a certain way, but more importantly that he has a physical and technical ABILITY to produce that "sound" which was many years in the making. Many many hours of repeating the same phrasing until it is natural as speaking or walking. THAT is high technique IMO. People who play music and make it somehow SOUND difficult to play rather than natural and flowing, are actually LACKING in technique skills, yet inevitably get labeled as "technical players". Ricardo Sr. Marlow has ended the thread! Knowledge bomb!!
_____________________________
Still the body, quiet the mind, free the soul
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 22 2013 19:43:47
|
|
tijeretamiel
Posts: 441
Joined: Jan. 6 2012
|
RE: Sight more important than sound? (in reply to Kalo)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kalo Well, as gloomy as this all sounds, one thing I still believe in is that TRUE ART will will always survive! Many of today's listeners may be hyponitized to all the pop music, autotune, lipsyncing performance/artist, but, there are many who want and still search for REAL music and real performance! Getting back to flamenco, it seems that it's modern state isn't in that bad health. There seem to be a good generation of young guitarists (eg Dani, Diego, etc) who will carry flamenco's torch for a good few years to come. I read that in Spain that Flamenco is generating a huge amount of revenue through tourism. On a broader context I think art evolves, with some musical forms may transpire to being evolutionary dead ends. In music waves come and go, musical forms which dominate the landscape do more often than not tend to run out of steam and the public loses interest, which I think has largely been in flamenco's favour, it's never been that fashionable/popular to fall out of fashion - it's never been in fashion. With the advent of the internet/Youtube, there's been a democratisation of music. Bodies like the music press, radio, MTV are no longer as powerful as they once were. Sight may be more important than sound to some but not to everyone. There's something for everyone.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 24 2013 9:59:48
|
|
Arash
Posts: 4495
Joined: Aug. 9 2006
From: Iran (living in Germany)
|
RE: Sight more important than sound? (in reply to Mark2)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark2 I used to play for an older female dancer, and she was pretty skilled. A friend of mine got a gig and he hired a younger dancer who was extremely attractive. His friends, who were not afficianados, ended up seeing both dancers on different nights and told my buddy how much more they liked the younger one. I thought at the time how lame that was. But years later, I realized that their thinking was maybe not as screwy as I had thought. In terms of entertainment value, perhaps the incredibly beautiful girl , who moved well, had some serious appeal even though her footwork was not in the same class as the other dancer. Not being flamencos, maybe they couldn't tell exactly how much more experience and technique the older lady had, or if they could, it was not enough to offset the difference in looks. I mean, one look, or move, from that hot girl could have made the difference. Does that make them stupid? Or simply honest in what they found entertaining? The point is that your friend could have hired a hot slut doing some striptease instead of dancing flamenco and his non-aficionado friends would enjoy and like that much more than an old lady dancing too. No difference. (Since you want to be honest). You are asking the wrong questions from the wrong people about the wrong subject. Those friends are simply not qualified to answer some questions (such as : which dancer was better?) and shouldn't be asked those questions at all.
_____________________________
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Aug. 24 2013 14:10:29
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
7.910156E-02 secs.
|