Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
|
RE: photo of the century
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login  | |
|
  
Ruphus
Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
|
 RE: photo of the century (in reply to Pimientito)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pimientito
Some continents where joined together anyway.
All of them. ( Pangäa)
Eventhough the most examples questioned here don´t appear too cogent, it seems worth to me considering that much of what is being named conspiracy theory to be too easily be put aside for something as unrelated to actual matters as ease of mind.
Because, the contemporary psyche can´t shoulder intellectual and emotional burdon.
It doesn´t want to be living in a world of vertical economy, where a self-centered minority of privilegeds are directing common sense, with states, media and educating institutions in their hands. It won´t even want to realize how vertical economizing has to inherently put at disadvantage the majority of fellow men, environment and future.
That way things can be interpreted in about any way desired without questioning, whilst "conspiracy theories" being such to demand in the same time.
That way an event even like 9/11 can be documented by videos that show systematical detonations, white glowing steel yet three weeks afterwards, and how a building collapsed that wasn´t even involved in collision or shock waves. Same with the Pentagon that was allegedly hit by a plane.
Yet, that ought to have been just the act of a bunch of simple minds who tricked out states services of yearly hundreds of billions $ budgets and potential to yet track down the keratin percentage in your pubic hair.
Sure.
Or how about something economically as innocent like anthroplogy? Even that faculty had to undergo outer predeterminition, in order to support the image of an just about right contemporary culture.
Thus the first Neandertaler facial fraction was completed with a scull like of a gorilla.
Caveman, whatever hominids, had to be primitive, cruel and selfish so that current conditions could equal "best you can get".
But Neandertalers burried their people on flowers and neat, and the findings reveal a more and more highly developed and social being.
Hominids, except of occasional details like missing handles H. had developed specialized forms of tools in a basically just as much refined form as modern ones. Living much more civilized than we ever thought.
With for instance American natives not having wandered in from Sibira some 12- or 13.500 years ago, but the American continent having been a melting pot already since the times when humans came in about 40.000 years ago. Some already per boat.
Civilzed prehistory dismounts the myth of "human nature" of short-sightedness and selfishness, as needed to interpret the status quo as being inevitably consequential. - Which it is not at all, but inhuman instead.
Clerics and economical chiefs have a long tradition in specifying public cognition and determining scientifical agenda and taboos. Starting from burning books over editorial policies to subtle technologies in chronolgical order.
The bacteria helicobakter pylori ( if I got that correctly spelled ) disappeared for about 60 years from public view, as the pharmaceutical industry was earning too well with useless drugs against gastritis. Just as behavioural science is currently re-discovering what someone had analyzed a rough 80 years ago already in his burned works.
And hypes like those on osteoporosis, cholesterine, menopause etc. can be organized all over the world with the help of just a hand full of bribed dignitaries.
In industrial safes loaf bought-off patents like that electrical motor that I saw on TV before it wasn´t seen again. It allowed one ton to be lifted one meter high with a 9-volt battery.
The sabotage against commonness is huge, with suppressed developments often times remaining not to be made good for.
Seems without emmediate investigation and reason against common insanity there will be no future soon.
Ruphus
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 1 2011 20:07:28
 |
|
Ruphus
Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010
|
|
RE: photo of the century (in reply to Pimientito)
|
|
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pimientito
Yeah but I wasnt talking about fractional reserve banking, credit based global economy, the temperature of burning aviation fuel in a building hit by a plane, the black nobility, secularism or anything else in your previous post.
All very interesting stuff but nothing to do with conceptualising the advantages or flaws of a theory in which planet earth is expanding. This is just a friendly debate, not a sermon.
You might want to read the thread again to find out what I was responding to.
quote:
ORIGINAL: cathulu
And can someone give me a one sentence translation of what Rufus said? 
Here you go:
There are more than enough examples of how official interpretation and science used to be and partially still are being manipulated, so that societies of unequal rights and access can be justified as naturally human.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Richard Jernigan
quote:
In industrial safes loaf bought-off patents like that electrical motor that I saw on TV before it wasn´t seen again. It allowed one ton to be lifted one meter high with a 9-volt battery.
You wouldn't have to lock such a patent away in a safe. It would be utterly useless. A typical 580 milliamp-hour 9-volt battery contains nearly 19,000 joules of energy. It only takes 9810 joules to lift a metric ton one meter. Such a motor would be only about 50% efficient, laughably crude.
RNJ
In the late eighties this case appeared valuable enough for German states TV to report on it in the news as spectacular invention.
Maybe the other interesting aspect was that such a motor was not much bigger than ~ 12 cm long and ~ 2 cm in diameter, readily designed so that hundreds of it could be combined to a powerful motor unit.
Also I guess that your data refer to todays battery capacity, which might differ from that of batteries from over 20 years ago.
Ruphus
|
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 2 2011 10:27:10
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.125 secs.
|
Printable Version
