Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
[Deleted]
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
bule_b
Posts: 65
Joined: Mar. 11 2009
|
RE: Fedex Suckx (in reply to kovachian)
|
|
|
kovachian, lol awesome ... dude I was hoping you'd reply, this is good entertainment .... I'm surprised I'm not on your ignore list thought. props for that. Its cowardly to post your piece and then end it with "thats all I have to say" and bow out. Thats a sign of someone who knows they have a weak defense. Wheres the fun in that? If you're gonna debate this with me then put your balls on the table and take the smack. why should I pm you? did you pm the original poster? no, you posted your (lack of) logic in the public domain. If you want to dish it then learn to take it too. This is going to be fun .... here you go dude a point by point rebuttal: quote:
Hemleoman says: FedEx requires more specifics than does UPS. Included in that is the particular aspect that deals with fees and charges and the release of a package from customs to fedex. this takes time to process, and if something wasn't declared in a very specific way it can take time to investigate, and sometimes this results in a delay between the transfer from customs to fedex. where did nealf (the original poster) state that "fedex required more specifics" or that "there was a problem with the declaration" or "there was a problem with the paperwork"?? Please excerpt his posts coz from what I read he repeatedly points out that there was no problem with the paperwork, in fact Fedex never even told him that. i.e. hemelomans post was ... pointless, i.e. unhelpful. quote:
hemelomans says: In this way, it is not custom's fault that the package was declared as it was, and it is not fedex's fault that the process of discovery takes as long as it does either. there are very specific things which need to be written and declared on customms invoices, sometimes things don't quite match up at first. kovachian exactly where did neal state that "customs delayed his package". In his first post he said: quote:
Note: Canada customs denied they had anything to do with delaying the package! In his second post he said: quote:
I spoke to a Fedex service manager today and now they claim that it was not a customs delay i.e. hemelomans post was ... pointless, i.e. unhelpful. In fact Hman is really unhelpful (coz instead of trying to help the guy get the refund as he claims he can in his last post (highly doubtful) he just was a jackass. Didn't even offer to help the dude out. So why say he could've helped when he didn't even offer that help right away. thats jackass behaviour. period. The dude obviously works for fedex coz he jumps to their defense every chance he gets. I eagerly await your rebuttal. Bring it on! And don't pm me post it here, if you pm me I'll just call you a coward and post your pm in this thread! lmao p.s. do you actually own a dictionary or did you just google it? Look up this one "defeat" and "illogical". Then apply both to yourself. lol this is so much fun!
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Mar. 28 2009 14:13:00
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.078125 secs.
|