Peoples´Society

Costs are rising and times are tough.
Please consider a donation to keep this
place going.

Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.

Peoples´Society

You are logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >>Discussions >>Off Topic >>

Page: [1]

Message

<< Newer Topic Older Topic >>

Ruphus

Posts: 3782
Joined: Nov. 18 2010

Peoples´Society

According to your constituition that is what your state is supposed to be, innit.
Just like in Germany too. A state for the people, no plutocracy, you know.

Yet, isn´t it remarkable how these kind of reigns cherish certain strict taboos?
Like say profits?
You won´t find any causal coherence to profits in any of official or concertated press declarations. Never ever.
For instance regarding bankruptcy of combines ( and following states cash injections to classically "preserve working positions". Naturally. Ain´t it dearly heart-breakingly caring for the employees) in the ways occuring ever since and increasingly lately, curiously in most profitable times ever.

A very actual example being a German energy combine. Its giant assets and infra structure privatized for nada, and not enough yet: Tarifs constantly raised beyond recognition ( now millions of households unable to humbly afford simple current or natural gas consume, and small manufacturers collapsing on mere energy bills ), and with all that literal cockaigne what is presented to the public?
Right: Bankruptcy of creaming off energy supplier.

Abstruse, isn´t it?
Profits with no end, and yet bankruptcy. Period.
Don´t ask. Just let the state do its job and pump in some affluent tax money.
Discrepancy, you say? Where all the cashed in money´s gone you ask?
You just don´t get it.

It´s the quantum physics of economy, don´t you know. Foolish little sceptic.
You say it´s a bold equation when oligarchs annect states combines, take out all the value and then on top of it all arrange for another tax money injection?
You ask why immense harvestings are not being considered under the aspect of alleged "bankruptcy"?
Don´t be so impertinent and inteferring into private affairs, god damnit.

What?
You point to todays headline according to which the German government will inject some aid into Insurances, because of their decreased income with life insurances, again due to low general interests.
So what?
Huh?
You ask where the government´s corresponding attention has been in regard of the insurances´customers.
Where the state´s aid or support for customers has been over all those decades when insurances scheduled fantasy fees and kept them untouched through possible competition by entertaining cartells? Cashing in fees hundreds % and even thousands % beyond any already profitable margins?

Why would the state never, not even once in all those decades, step in to protect / support most outrageously fleeced people and small companies, see no issue with yet the most incredible gagging and depriving contracting against customers, but now chime in immediately when insurance combines have hardly yet started seeing "losses" in even just sections of their business?

You think routines like that clearly indicate whom these constructs under the label of "state" actually belong to?
You suppose them to be privilegeds´owned plutocracies?

Just take a break, lay back and listen to some chilly music. You are only overworked and a bit pressed by the recession, which again noone knows how it has come about, and where in the equation a steadily growing loss for the world´s working folks must be a few´s cash cow.
You know, money is disappearing without becoming another partie´s gains. That is Black Holes which you thought to be exclusively appearing in astronomics, because you simply don´t know the teachings of capitalist economy.

You say what disappears must be going somewhere.
That is because you just don´t know what leading heads in the common economics academies have constructed. If you were only informed enough, you´d know that profits let alone profiteering do not exist. They are actually self-evident inherent side effects that can´t be viewed discretely.
In the contrary to losses. Those can be defined in the construct and also be declared to revenue office, to the state and to the little idiots who actually pay tax and need to understand governements´ following investments to preserve working positions.
>yawn< :O|

Now may you finally shut up and cease those stupid amateur questions based on weird logical instances like input / output and thelike nonesense.

Thank you, dear; be nice and sleep well. >pecky, pecky<

Ruphus

REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE | Date Mar. 10 2014 13:07:26