Foro Flamenco


Posts Since Last Visit | Advanced Search | Home | Register | Login

Today's Posts | Inbox | Profile | Our Rules | Contact Admin | Log Out



Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.

This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.

We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.





Ramirez 2A   You are logged in as Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Login
Message<< Newer Topic  Older Topic >>
 
Michael1917

 

Posts: 146
Joined: Jan. 5 2007
 

Ramirez 2A 

I wasn't sure if this should go in the Classified post or the Lutherie post or??? But I was curious if any flamenco experts out there know anything about this specific Ramirez 2A or if they have thoughts on the 2A models that were built at Ramirez. This one signed by Jose Ramirez III. Are there any specific things one should look out for in 2A Ramirez?

http://www.12fret.com/content/2012/05/09/ramirez-flamenco-blanca-model-2a-professional-1977/

Cheers, Michael



Images are resized automatically to a maximum width of 800px

Attachment (1)
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 2 2013 22:49:35

C. Vega

 

Posts: 379
Joined: Jan. 16 2004
 

RE: Ramirez 2A (in reply to Michael1917

That sure is a helluva lot of story for one used guitar on that 12th Fret website!

At the time this particular guitar was made the only real difference between the 1a and 2a models was the use of some wood that didn't quite meet Jose III's lofty cosmetic standards for use in a first class instrument. In this case my guess would be the dark resin streak on the back being the reason for the 2a designation. The 2a models sold for a bit less money when they were new. Structurally, both models are identical.
The Ramirez III signature really doesn't count for much. From about mid-1967 onwards, every guitar made in the Ramirez shop received the boss's signature....Jose III, Jose IV and, currently. Amalia Ramirez...but in nearly every case they were actually made by other workers. Jose IV was perhaps the most hands-on luthier of the three. Jose III most likely didn't make any guitars himself after the 1950s. Amalia has apparently made a few and she seems to like posing for photos and videos in the workshop but her primary focus has always been the commercial and administrative aspects of the business.
By the time this guitar was made they had stopped using the initials stamped on the foot inside the guitar that identified the primary assembler of a particular guitar but this one may have a number stamped on the underside of the top below the fingerboard indentifying the assembler. I'm not sure when they stopped using the numbers. These names, initials and numbers are listed on the Ramirez website.
Contrary to what some believe, or would have you believe, Ramirez guitars (regardless of stamped initials, numbers, etc.) were not and are not made from start to finish by a single worker. There were and are a number of pairs of hands involved.

Prior to 1967 there were no actual model designations and the labels did not have the extended section with the signature and serial number but from about 1957 and into the mid-1960s the Ramirez shop made what was more or less the equivalent of a 2a model. These guitars also utilized wood that was considered to be somewhat less than cosmetically ideal but still properly cut and well seasoned. They can be identified by a label that has a gold border and the initial letters of the label text, but not the Ramirez name, printed in red.
They were sometimes assembled under the supervision of senior oficiales by workers who were about to be granted full artisan status by Ramirez and sometimes by the senior workers themselves.
The Madrid luthier Felix Manzanero, who was working for Ramirez at that time, told me that if one of these guitars has no initial stamp on the foot it was probably made by one of the up-and-comers but any initialed guitar would have been made by a fully qualified oficial. Only workers with full artisan status were allowed to stamp their initials in the guitars.
Felix also said that the flamenco guitars with the gold-bordered labels were usually purchased by the real working pros.... the guys who played the clubs, tablaos and penas on a regular basis. Most of them weren't particularly concerned with minor cosmetic blemishes in the wood. They were more interested in sound and playability...as well as in saving a few pesetas. I think that this is one of the reasons that when you do encounter these guitars they often look like (continuing the 12th Fret's equine analogy) they've been ridden hard and put away wet as opposed to the pristine collector's case queen primera models that sometimes come up for sale.

FWIW, in the forty-odd years I've been fooling around with this stuff I've only encountered perhaps two or three Ramirez classical models with a gold-bordered label but I have personally seen well over a dozen flamencos plus photos of and references to numerous other examples.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 4 2013 2:01:52
 
Michael1917

 

Posts: 146
Joined: Jan. 5 2007
 

RE: Ramirez 2A (in reply to C. Vega

Thanks again for all the information. 12th fret sent me a bunch more photos that show the cracks on the soundboard that were repaired. It doesn't look pretty but the repairs are apparently well done. I've always read (and been told) to stay away from vintage guitars that have soundboard cracks or just a little too much repair on the soundboard as opposed to cracks in the back or on the sides. But if the repairs are well done and the guitar is solid and has a sound one likes .... Ah well.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 4 2013 5:09:16

C. Vega

 

Posts: 379
Joined: Jan. 16 2004
 

RE: Ramirez 2A (in reply to Michael1917

I wouldn't automatically reject an older guitar because of a soundboard crack(s) but it would depend on the size, number, location and quality of the repair work.
My 1963 Ramirez blanca (spruce top/pegs) has a hairline crack about two inches long on the bass side upper bout located about midway between the fingerboard and the edge of the guitar. It had been repaired long before I bought the guitar and doesn't bother me in the least.
It also has a small (approximately one inch square) damaged area on the perimeter of the treble side lower bout of the back. It looks like it was perhaps knocked against the corner of a chair seat. It was also previously repaired and I have no problem with it.
It's been refretted, has had the golpeador replaced and it has a fair number of the minor nicks, dings and scratches one would expect to see on a 50 year old flamenco guitar that's been around the block a few times but, all things considered, it's still in very nice overall condition with a lot of miles still left in it. It's a cool old guitar with lots of character, a throaty rajo voice and a funky old-school vibe that I really like. It's a total hoot to play.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Jan. 4 2013 13:44:05
 
pjn

 

Posts: 113
Joined: Mar. 23 2009
From: New York

RE: Ramirez 2A (in reply to C. Vega

Hola Charles, how are you? I just wrote the 12th fret to point out that "golpe" is neither a proper noun nor is there an accent on the e -- these people are in the guitar business? They sound like kids.
  REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |  Date Feb. 1 2013 0:26:14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >>Discussions >>Lutherie >> Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET

0.046875 secs.