Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
GUITARRA FLAMENCA FELIPE CONDE REEDICIÓN DOMINGO ESTESO
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
Erik van Goch
Posts: 1787
Joined: Jul. 17 2012
From: Netherlands
|
RE: GUITARRA FLAMENCA FELIPE CONDE R... (in reply to erictjie)
|
|
|
As a brand new member i just had a look at some some of the other forums and was pleasantly surprised to find myself a various range of very interesting vintage flamenco guitars, often offered for (extremely) low prizes. Personally i lack the knowledge to judge them on there merits.... are they under-prized? are mine over-prized? or are they just not as good as the ones i happen to know. A dutch flamenco magazine ones was very surprised to find out Manolo Sanlucar was playing a classical Jose Ramirez because "that type of instrument was known to be one of the hardest guitars to play". It is indeed, but what they didn't seem to know was that the classical Jose Ramirez guitars from the early 60ties (when he was still was a student of Contreras) happens to be the best playable guitars available. You can probably buy several Jose Ramirez guitars from the 70ties for the prize you have to pay for one classical Jose Ramirez from the early 60ties. Within a very short period of time they changed from being excellent to being crap, just like a good or a bad wine year. Although i wouldn't recommend you to buy a classical Jose Ramirez guitar from the 70ties, it would be an excellent period to buy yourself a Jose Ramirez Flamenco guitar. I have no idea how good a flamenco Ramirez from the sixties is, nor a Conde from the 70ties or a Gerundino from the 60ties. You simply can't know everything. The main difference between a standard guitar and a top level concert guitar is the way it projects it's sound. My cheap triplex Ibanez produces more or less the same sound in every direction and a mic will pick up the same consistent sound on various parts of the guitar. A top class guitar on the other hand directs various parts of the audio spectrum to specialized parts of the guitar. As a result a closely placed mic will only pick up a limited selection of the audio spectrum making your top class guitar sound highly unbalanced and equally bad or maybe even worse then the cheaper guitar. In an acoustic situation the top class guitar has the better hand, but the way it projects it's sound strongly varies from guitar to guitar. The big question is how it will cope with various situations. Even when you are able to play the instrument it is very difficult to judge it without the help of someone with capable hands and/or trained ears (you simply cant play the guitar and listen to it from a distance at the same time). Obviously the first task from a concert guitar is to project it's sound into the direction of the audience in a packed concert hall. But as a musician you also want to enjoy that full and rich sound yourself. Not all concert guitars are able to do so. Some sound excellent to the players ears but can't please the audience at all, and other guitars sound superb to the public butt only average and far from inspirational to the person playing it. Only a guitar that is able to inspire both the player and the audience is worth 20K to me. My father has one like that. If you sit in front of it it doesn't sound very impressive at all (it actually sounds quite bad) but if you take some distance you can enjoy the same superb sound the player is experiencing and with the possible exception of the first row(s) it can easily mesmerize a fully packed concert hall to even the most remote back rows. My very expensive Conde can sound superb to it's player, but fails to deliver in a concert hall situation due to incomplete sound projection (part of the frequency spectrum projects in the opposite direction). An other instrument that didn't seem to deliver in the privacy of our home did do surprisingly well in a concert situation. Our best guitar happens to be a Gerundino. Unfortunately it doesn't reveal it's temperament to just any player an it will only serve someone able and willing to kick it's ass with loads of energy (ore someone willing to chance strings every single day). Unfortunately i'm not able to do either in other words i'm not capable enough to kiss it awake. The only one i know that is able to reveal it's temperament is it's previous owner who happens to be Paco Pena. When you have the privilege to play one of his regular guitars they seem to remember his energy for a while, producing a wall of sound. But after a while they will lose that quality, like a flower that is deprived from it's water. And when Paco pics up one of our guitars you can see the opposite reaction.... after a wile the guitar blossums, like a flower receiving water after years of dryness. So you see it can be pretty tricky to validate a guitar.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Jul. 18 2012 5:52:27
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.0625 secs.
|