Welcome to one of the most active flamenco sites on the Internet. Guests can read most posts but if you want to participate click here to register.
This site is dedicated to the memory of Paco de Lucía, Ron Mitchell, Guy Williams, Linda Elvira, Philip John Lee, Craig Eros, Ben Woods, David Serva and Tom Blackshear who went ahead of us.
We receive 12,200 visitors a month from 200 countries and 1.7 million page impressions a year. To advertise on this site please contact us.
|
|
Learning by listening
|
You are logged in as Guest
|
Users viewing this topic: none
|
|
Login | |
|
gj Michelob
Posts: 1531
Joined: Nov. 7 2008
From: New York City/San Francisco
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to MarcChrys)
|
|
|
One of the (many) reasons why I felt I could relate to Flamenco, was that it forgives the need of reading-writing music, and emphasizes a more proletarian approach to learning by “emulation”. As a kid my parents could not afford to provide proper music lessons, nor would they have taken the “risk” of turning a child into a “musician”. I learned whatever I did on the street, regrettably sort of behind my parents’ back (I am sure many in my older generation had similar experiences). And now that I am older, I want music to stay within the tightly marked boundaries of a hobby. I cannot afford the luxury of dedication any serious music program could require. So by ear and by eyes, listening and watching (God bless youtube, really), does it handsomely for me, to add fresh ideas and new challenges every time I wish to seek them out. I am not suggesting that one should not learn proper music theory, in fact it would infinitely help. When the scholarly pros discuss “theory” here, I do suffer the pains of inadequacy. I have a most remedial appreciation of traditional written notation I’d learnt studying cello (my music revenge after passing the NY Bar), but I am happily back to “can you do that one more time, and may be slow it down a notch, amigo?”. If there is a trick it must be training your senses to appreciate “what’s going on”, the more you try to download in your mind what you hear and convert sound into mechanical images, the easier it becomes. After a couple of years of doing what you are (and many here) doing, I sort of envision the guitarist’s hands, as I listen to a Falseta.
_____________________________
gj Michelob
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 8:15:24
|
|
NormanKliman
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sep. 1 2007
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to bursche)
|
|
|
Bursche, about Ron's idea of listening for open strings, I'll add that the sixth string is particularly important in this sense. When you start to transcribe something, it's a good idea to go over the recording at least once, listening for the lowest note and determining if it's open or fretted. That's one of the biggest and easiest clues to determining tuning and capo position. For example, many years ago, I worked out Sabicas' Los Puertos in E in standard tuning but had to start over when I realized that there's a D bass in there! (It's standard tuning with the sixth tuned down to D, in case anyone's interested.) Arash, I highly recommend doing your own transcribing. Steve Vai called it a "miracle drug" or something like that in an interview. It really does sharpen your skills, and the benefits aren't just limited to your head, either, because it provides a very good warm-up if you use the guitar to work things out. When I spend the first part of a day transcribing, I notice a big difference when I play that evening. Obviously, it improves your reading skills, too, if you figure out how to write things yourself. Learning the rules of theory behind writing can be a bit of a chore, but you can always use tab and add the time values in stems and beams (time values really should be learned, anyway). HemeolaMan, what you mentioned sounds interesting. Would you mind explaining a little? Or maybe you could point me toward some references to learn more about that. Thanks.
_____________________________
Be here now.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 10:48:09
|
|
gj Michelob
Posts: 1531
Joined: Nov. 7 2008
From: New York City/San Francisco
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to NormanKliman)
|
|
|
quote:
Arash, I highly recommend doing your own transcribing. Steve Vai called it a "miracle drug" or something like that in an interview. It really does sharpen your skills, and the benefits aren't just limited to your head, either, because it provides a very good warm-up if you use the guitar to work things out. When I spend the first part of a day transcribing, I notice a big difference when I play that evening. Obviously, it improves your reading skills, too, if you figure out how to write things yourself. Learning the rules of theory behind writing can be a bit of a chore, but you can always use tab and add the time values in stems and beams (time values really should be learned, anyway). Words of pure wisdom, Norman. Ricardo recently recommanded i should do exactly that (while i was looking for someone to help transcribe my own compositions). I bought "sybilius" -the software- and had some fun palying with it, but must confess i did not get the immediate -after two weeks of struggling- satisfaction i was hoping for. However, I think one has to work with a software of some sort, how else do you propose one could check the accuracy of what he writes, if simply on paper?
_____________________________
gj Michelob
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 11:04:28
|
|
NormanKliman
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sep. 1 2007
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to gj Michelob)
|
|
|
quote:
However, I think one has to work with a software of some sort, how else do you propose one could check the accuracy of what he writes, if simply on paper? Hi GJ, I rely on software to loop and slow down the music. It also distorts the music as others have said (the slower the music the greater the distorsion), but the better programs offer a variety of methods for slowing down different kinds of sounds (for percussion, for voices, etc.) without changing the pitch. So if you fiddle around with that, then double-check at several different speeds, then triple-check against normal speed, and then go back and check again months later...it'll be less of a nagging doubt. But seriously, you do have to go back and check repeatedly from different "perspectives," although it's also true that, after you become familiar with the software and its effects on audio, you know when it's right and when you're "fooling yourself."
_____________________________
Be here now.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 11:23:38
|
|
HemeolaMan
Posts: 1514
Joined: Jul. 13 2007
From: Chicago
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to bursche)
|
|
|
Norman, like ricardo said, the best way to learn is to use your voice. Hear a phhrase, sing it back. memorize it in terms of where it is in the air, not where it is on the guitar. Listen to a phrase once, then hear it in your head. you can use your brain to slow it down, its really easy once you try. think about your favorite song, and sing it slow. there. you've done it once. now try it with something new. hear it once, sing it back, slow it down in your head, sing it slowly etc. The guitar should be the last part of the equation. it is the thing that you use to make the sounds that are in your head. make sure the sounds are in your head before you try to make them on a guitar. You use the instrument. it does not use you. Sibelius is a professional engraving software. it can be difficult to use, but no where near as inconvenient as finale! I use sibelius for a ton of things, and I am quite profficient. it takes a while to get used to tho
_____________________________
[signature][/signature]
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 15:57:36
|
|
NormanKliman
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sep. 1 2007
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to HemeolaMan)
|
|
|
Ah, I understand you now. Thanks for the explanation. Yeah, important underlying concept. Not my intention to solicit a response and then argue against it, but I think it ought to be pointed out that the guitar is polyphonic as well as... well, I don't know the right word, but there are often at least two different ways to play the same notes in the same way (as opposed to a piano, for example). Also, fast picados, alzapúas, etc. would be too hard to determine accurately without audio software. Or, for example, when an idea breaks away from a pattern at only one point, in order to end on the right note, the point of divergence usually has more to do with the fretboard than musical coherence (Sabicas). But it's a very important underlying concept. I usually do that when I first have a crack at something with the software. Albert Collins once said, "I used to sit in high school, humming with my mouth, and then I’d go home and see if I could play it with my hands." That's some of the best advice I've ever heard!
_____________________________
Be here now.
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 8 2009 22:14:06
|
|
MarcChrys
Posts: 121
Joined: Jan. 11 2009
From: England (West Yorkshire/Lancashire)
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to Guest)
|
|
|
I'm no expert (!) but my experience of 'working out' music is that it's a combination of: a) having the gift of musical kinesiology (e.g. if you hear a tune like 'We Wish You a Merry Xmas', can you instantly play the melody on the guitar? I usually find most tunes I hear I can do this straight off...and sometimes with chord progressions). I'm sure anyone can develop this by practising. b) familiarity with musical patterns - as someone from more of a rock/jazz background, I can recognize chord progressions in most popular pieces - e.g. Blues, rock n roll, rock. Similarly, it seems to me that flamenco (and no doubt someone will shoot me down in flames!) has quite a few stock patterns and variations on a theme - e.g. Bulerias. So once you have some idea of the style of a particular piece, all (well, *most*) else is embellishment :) c) Knowledge of the guitar's sonic and spatial boundaries - by this, I mean, even virtuoso guitarists are 'limited' by the possibilities of the guitar's composition/construction/tuning, so often they choose the most elegant/logical way to play a piece. d) knowing whether the original piece uses a special tuning or a capo. e) YouTube! :)
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 9 2009 6:34:10
|
|
bursche
Posts: 1182
Joined: Jul. 19 2007
From: Frankfurt, Germany
|
RE: Learning by listening (in reply to Ricardo)
|
|
|
Thanks for all the replies, guys! One night and I've got novels of good advice here=) quote:
sing along, at tempo, the notes and pitches EXACTLY Good point, Ricardo. When I learned these falsetas from Tauromagia I spent days sitting, listening, clapping and making ridiculous niose with my voice (kind of singing). But even though I really suck badly at singing it brought great improvement. Now that you mentioned it again I'll maybe go over to figure out things more method-based, because my greatest enemy at "earing" compositions is a lack of concentration. I guess I'll have to be more systematic. About slowing music down: When you have the opportunity to convert cd's to a lossless audio, distortion should normally be very little, this worked perfect for me so far.
_____________________________
Visit me on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRaGz6Lf-Uz0HxUv-dGQFLQ
|
|
|
REPORT THIS POST AS INAPPROPRIATE |
Date Feb. 9 2009 10:46:11
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts
|
|
|
Forum Software powered by ASP Playground Advanced Edition 2.0.5
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 ASPPlayground.NET |
0.109375 secs.
|